2016
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2015.2445713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic In Vivo Evaluation of PEDOT/CNT for Stable Neural Recordings

Abstract: Objective Sub-cellular sized chronically implanted recording electrodes have demonstrated significant improvement in single-unit (SU) yield over larger recording probes. Additional work expands on this initial success by combining the subcellular fiber-like lattice structures with the design space versatility of silicon microfabrication to further improve the signal-to-noise ratio, density of electrodes, and stability of recorded units over months to years. However, ultra-small microelectrodes present very hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
162
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, methods need to be developed to fabricate multi-channel devices. In addition, conducting polymer and nanomaterial modifications of the electrode sites to improve neural recording specificity and long-term quality can greatly expand the versatility of this device [25,49,101]. Additional modifications to include bioactive coatings that promote neuronal health and reduce acute inflammation may further improve electrode tissue integration [51,53,102105].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, methods need to be developed to fabricate multi-channel devices. In addition, conducting polymer and nanomaterial modifications of the electrode sites to improve neural recording specificity and long-term quality can greatly expand the versatility of this device [25,49,101]. Additional modifications to include bioactive coatings that promote neuronal health and reduce acute inflammation may further improve electrode tissue integration [51,53,102105].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, material failure is believed to range from recording site to insulation damages including delamination, crack propagation, hydration which leads to loss of dielectric properties and iconic contamination (Escamilla-Mackert et al, 2009; Gilgunn et al, 2013; Kim et al, 2014; Kozai et al, 2014a; Kozai et al, 2015a; Kozai et al, 2015b; Prasad et al, 2014; Prasad et al, 2012; Sankar et al, 2014; Ware et al, 2014). On the other hand, biological failure modes are believed to be due to the inflammatory reactive tissue response to the implanted electrode (Gilgunn et al, 2012; Jaquins-Gerstl et al, 2011; Karumbaiah et al, 2012; Kozai et al, 2014a; Kozai et al, 2014b; Kozai et al, 2012a; Kozai et al, 2014c; Kozai et al, 2010; Potter et al, 2013; Rennaker et al, 2007; Turner et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEDOT-PSS also displayed a 15-fold improvement in charge-injection capacity of ~15 mC/cm 2 (55). The problem for PEDOT-PSS is durability, and while electrodeposition of PEDOT with a tetrafluoroborate (56,57) or perhaps inclusion of appropriately functionalized carbon nanotubes (58) improves electrochemical performance and stability, long term robustness especially for neural stimulation remains elusive. Instead, metallic/oxide-based coatings are more likely to demonstrate long term stability in vivo for neural stimulation applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an exposed geometric surface area of 500 μm 2 , carbon fibers show impedance levels of greater than 1 MΩ at 1 kHz and a charge-injection limit below 0.05 mC/cm 2 . The majority of prior work with carbon fiber tips has relied on coatings with PEDOT-PSS or PEDOT-PSS with carbon nanotubes (58). Unfortunately, as previously noted, PEDOT is unlikely to provide a stable electrochemical interface for chronic neural stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%