1986
DOI: 10.1378/chest.90.2.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
7

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
19
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Tougaard and colleagues 17 found better physical function and total function in favour of the intervention group, and Littlejohns et al 23 showed a significantly greater improvement in physical function in the intervention group. Other studies used the Health Status Questionnaire 2.0, 20 the General Health Questionnaire, 18 and a self-designed questionnaire (consisting of elements of the health locus of control scale, respiratory health questionnaire, Zung scales, and SIP scales) 22 to measure general health status. In the latest two studies general HRQoL was not significantly different between the self-management education and control group, although Gourley et al 20 showed significantly improved scores for the well being dimension of the Health Status Questionnaire 2.0 in the intervention group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Tougaard and colleagues 17 found better physical function and total function in favour of the intervention group, and Littlejohns et al 23 showed a significantly greater improvement in physical function in the intervention group. Other studies used the Health Status Questionnaire 2.0, 20 the General Health Questionnaire, 18 and a self-designed questionnaire (consisting of elements of the health locus of control scale, respiratory health questionnaire, Zung scales, and SIP scales) 22 to measure general health status. In the latest two studies general HRQoL was not significantly different between the self-management education and control group, although Gourley et al 20 showed significantly improved scores for the well being dimension of the Health Status Questionnaire 2.0 in the intervention group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Only four other published studies have reported randomised controlled trials of group self-management education in COPD and none of these attempted to recruit patients from disease registers. [41][42][43][44][45] Unlike BELLA, all of these studies relied on education from healthcare professionals, along with exercise or other components delivered by healthcare professionals in three studies. [43][44][45] More recently, Rice and colleagues have described large reductions in emergency department attendance and all-cause hospitalisation in patients with COPD at high risk of hospitalisation, with a diseasemanagement intervention consisting of a single 1-1.5 hour group education session and monthly follow-up phone calls by a case manager.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these studies had a randomized controlled design, and the conclusions, therefore, remain preliminary. In addition, one study has suggested that an education programme may substantially reduce the utilization of health care resources by COPD patients [3], although other studies have suggested that education programmes only affect health-related knowledge without affecting health status, as such [4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%