2017
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic scrotal pain and microsurgical spermatic cord denervation: tricks of the trade

Abstract: Every practicing urologist encounters patients complaining of chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP). This condition can be equally frustrating for both patients and clinicians as there are no clear treatment guidelines, or pathways, for urologists to follow. As a result, most patients typically seek out multiple providers without improvements in their symptoms. Fortunately, microsurgical spermatic cord denervation (MSCD) is becoming an accepted, reliable and reproducible technique for definitively addressing CSC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the available previous literature, good response rates have been reported with MSCD in men with chronic orchialgia without an anatomic, infectious, or pathologic etiology; however, there is always a failure rate reported, typically of approximately 15% in most series, which leaves clinicians and patients frustrated. 3,4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the potential reasons for failure of MSCD in carefully selected surgical patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify potential predictors of failure to counsel patients on preoperatively and potentially help understand failure postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the available previous literature, good response rates have been reported with MSCD in men with chronic orchialgia without an anatomic, infectious, or pathologic etiology; however, there is always a failure rate reported, typically of approximately 15% in most series, which leaves clinicians and patients frustrated. 3,4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the potential reasons for failure of MSCD in carefully selected surgical patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify potential predictors of failure to counsel patients on preoperatively and potentially help understand failure postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…first reported MSCD in 1978. Good response rates have been reported in multiple studies since that initial experience 467891011121314. Another anatomic study of the nerves in and in proximity to the spermatic cord has identified sensory and autonomic nerve fibers, most of which were found to be sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers, and few parasympathetic nerve fibers in the spermatic cord and surrounding tissues 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Multiple algorithms for diagnosing and treating CSP have been proposed, but none have been validated [5,6] because it is a difficult condition to manage, and varied practices exist with reference to it. Therefore, our review aimed to: 1) Overview current approaches to the clinical evaluation of CSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%