2004
DOI: 10.1080/02678370412331324996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic strain, daily work stress and pain among workers with rheumatoid arthritis: Does job stress make a bad day worse?

Abstract: The structure of the job and the daily experience of work are challenges for workers with rheumatoid arthritis. Yet little is known about how these two factors interact to put workers with chronic pain at risk for worse pain on a given day. This exploratory 20 workday diary study of 27 workers with rheumatoid arthritis used hierarchical linear modeling to examine how the structure of the job and neuroticism moderate the relationship between daily undesirable work events (daily stressors), and pain reports with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these can be construed as a dimension of forethought (Bandura, 1986) or what control theorists term feed-forward activation ---widely considered a key functional component of human self-regulation (Ford, 1987; Karoly, 1999, 2010). Moreover, goal-centered anticipatory cognitions, preparatory mindsets, autobiographical planning(what we are here calling goal schemas) can be especially potent in light of recent research demonstrating: (a) that future-oriented simulation encompassing various themes (such as work and play) can impact daily life performance (D’Argembeau, Renaud & Van Der Linden, 2011), (b) that the within-person dynamics of instrumental activity and task engagement at work are influenced by self-relevant thoughts and positive emotions (Binnewies, Sonnentag & Mojza, 2009; Fay & Sonnentag, 2012), (c) that goal schemas, like other modes of schematic cognition, can have durable effects (Fiske & Taylor, 2008), and (d) that pain’s effects on goal pursuit can be persistent and modulated by various aspects of goal cognition (Affleck, Tennen, Urrows, Higgins, Abeles, Hall et al, 1998; Fifield, McQuillan, Armeli, Tennen, Reisine, & Affleck, 2004; Karoly & Ruehlman, 1996; Pomaki, Karoly & Maes, 2009). …”
Section: Schematic Goal Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these can be construed as a dimension of forethought (Bandura, 1986) or what control theorists term feed-forward activation ---widely considered a key functional component of human self-regulation (Ford, 1987; Karoly, 1999, 2010). Moreover, goal-centered anticipatory cognitions, preparatory mindsets, autobiographical planning(what we are here calling goal schemas) can be especially potent in light of recent research demonstrating: (a) that future-oriented simulation encompassing various themes (such as work and play) can impact daily life performance (D’Argembeau, Renaud & Van Der Linden, 2011), (b) that the within-person dynamics of instrumental activity and task engagement at work are influenced by self-relevant thoughts and positive emotions (Binnewies, Sonnentag & Mojza, 2009; Fay & Sonnentag, 2012), (c) that goal schemas, like other modes of schematic cognition, can have durable effects (Fiske & Taylor, 2008), and (d) that pain’s effects on goal pursuit can be persistent and modulated by various aspects of goal cognition (Affleck, Tennen, Urrows, Higgins, Abeles, Hall et al, 1998; Fifield, McQuillan, Armeli, Tennen, Reisine, & Affleck, 2004; Karoly & Ruehlman, 1996; Pomaki, Karoly & Maes, 2009). …”
Section: Schematic Goal Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illnessrelated variables have also been examined for their contribution to work disability, including pain, disease duration, functional limitations, joint counts, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates (11,12,14,15,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Largely absent from arthritis research, however, are individuals' perceptions of job strain (24,25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been particularly the case in terms of studies exploring the relationship between stress and health behaviours (cf., O'Connor, Jones, Conner, McMillan, & Ferguson, 2008;O'Connor, Hendrickx, et al, 2009). Such approaches have ignored the burgeoning body of evidence showing that fluctuations in within-person stressful daily hassles are important in understanding stress-outcome processes and that major stressors can have a cascading effect on daily undesirable events (e.g., Affleck, Tennen, Urrows, & Higgins, 1994;Dancey, Taghavi, & Fox, 1998;Fifield et al, 2004;Kanner, Coyne, Schaefer, & Lazarus, 1981;Newman, O'Connor, & Conner, 2007;Verkuil et al, 2012;Zautra et al, 1991). An early example comes from work by Kanner et al (1981).…”
Section: Challenge #3: Need To Incorporate Personality and Lifespan Amentioning
confidence: 99%