2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Struggle: An Institutional Ethnography of Chronic Pain and Marginalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, institutional ethnographers talk to secondary informants, they collect the documents used or discussed by the informants and map the work, the texts and the people involved. As done by other institutional ethnographies [e.g., 44 48 ], this article focuses only on results from the first level of analysis [ 49 ]. Indeed, second level analysis will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, institutional ethnographers talk to secondary informants, they collect the documents used or discussed by the informants and map the work, the texts and the people involved. As done by other institutional ethnographies [e.g., 44 48 ], this article focuses only on results from the first level of analysis [ 49 ]. Indeed, second level analysis will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terminology around concepts such as ‘working class’, ‘difficulty making ends meet’ and ‘socioeconomic deprivation’; ‘disabled’ or in receipt of ‘disability benefits’; ‘ethnic minority groups’ or ‘racialised groups’; and LGBTQIA + identification would benefit from input with relevant groups and knowledgeable about the local context, in addition to consideration of approaches other researchers have used. 26,36,56,57 Following recruitment, data collection of demographics/social identities may be complex. Brady et al 19,52 offer a good example of brief initial interviews that were undertaken to collect intersectional data.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using intersectionality as a theoretical framework, we are better able to embrace the necessary complexity for researching chronic pain, and pain care, equitably. The use of a reductionist frame can force unachievable objectivity on to complex health concepts, and there is an increasing realisation in the field that we need to understand the individual within the social world, 26 hence the intersectional perspective of social identities conceptualised with associated oppressions. We must further recognise that each step of the research process is more subjective than we often think 48 and, by overstating claims of objectivity, we put at risk our ability to make a difference in the real world and to the people who need both research and clinical focus the most.…”
Section: Future Directions and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations