2019 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ubmk.2019.8907070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Tympanic Membrane Diagnosis based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, digital image processing techniques such as local binary pattern (LBP) and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) have been used. These systems have been supported using traditional machine learning algorithms (Basaran et al, 2019a). Moreover, in some related studies, it has been observed that segmentation methods have been recommended to focus on TM annulus (Başaran, Cömert & Çelik, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this purpose, digital image processing techniques such as local binary pattern (LBP) and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) have been used. These systems have been supported using traditional machine learning algorithms (Basaran et al, 2019a). Moreover, in some related studies, it has been observed that segmentation methods have been recommended to focus on TM annulus (Başaran, Cömert & Çelik, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in some related studies, it has been observed that segmentation methods have been recommended to focus on TM annulus (Başaran, Cömert & Çelik, 2020). Depending on the advances in deep learning, CNNs have been adopted to the OM diagnosis task (Basaran et al, 2019a(Basaran et al, , 2019bBaşaran, Cömert & Çelik, 2020). In the training of the CNNs, both the transfer learning (Cha et al, 2019) and training from scratch (Lee, Choi & Chung, 2019) approaches have been performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of normal TM samples is 535 whereas the numbers of AOM, CSOM, Earwax samples are 119, 63 and 140 respectively. By the way, the samples belonging to otitis externa (41), ear ventilation tube (16), foreign bodies in the ear (3), pseudo-membranes (11), and tympanoskleros (28) were collected in the other class. Each otoscope sample in the database was evaluated by three ENT specialists.…”
Section: Eardrum Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw otoscope images were input to the AlexNet in this study. To validate the model, 10-fold cross-validation was also used and the model ensured an accuracy of 98.77% [16]. A computational model relying upon the Faster R-CNN and pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) was introduced for separating normal and abnormal TMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%