1978
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370160077012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic Upper Extremity Arterial Insufficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although still untested clinically, sympathectomy may prove to be an important complement to arterial reconstruction in treating patients with impaired forearm runoff because of severe occlusive disease. 22 '49 In our case, the patient who was treated with cervicodorsal sympathectomy had nearly complete relief of symptoms, with a light, residual forearm claudication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Although still untested clinically, sympathectomy may prove to be an important complement to arterial reconstruction in treating patients with impaired forearm runoff because of severe occlusive disease. 22 '49 In our case, the patient who was treated with cervicodorsal sympathectomy had nearly complete relief of symptoms, with a light, residual forearm claudication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Conversely, a digital brachial index above 0.7 is indicative of adequate blood flow (Zimmerman, 1994). It is unclear why the clinically-accepted threshold has been set to 0.7; however, it was likely influenced by the study of Gelberman et al (1978) and Gross et al (1978). Gelberman studied a group of patients with replanted digits, and observed that all patients with a digital pulse pressure that was less than 75% of the contralateral side suffered from severe cold intolerance (Gelberman, 1978).…”
Section: Chronic Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelberman studied a group of patients with replanted digits, and observed that all patients with a digital pulse pressure that was less than 75% of the contralateral side suffered from severe cold intolerance (Gelberman, 1978). While Gross et al reported that patients with a segmental pressure of 63% or less on the contralateral side suffered from forearm claudication (Gross, 1978). Zimmerman et al (1994) used 0.7 as a midway between these two studies to guide their choice between ligation or reconstruction of the ulnar artery in patients with ulnar artery occlusion.…”
Section: Chronic Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%