2001
DOI: 10.1006/qres.2001.2230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronology of Inland Eolian Dunes on the Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA

Abstract: Most inland eolian dunes associated with rivers on the Georgia Coastal Plain probably date to glacial periods. Direct dating of the dune sand by optically stimulated luminescence dating, combined with limiting ages from radiocarbon dating, shows that dunes formed during isotope stage 2, stage 3, the transition between stages 4 and 5, and isotope stage 6 or earlier. Most of the dates indicate dune activity between 30,000 and 15,000 years ago. Holocene activity included limited and local reworking of the crests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We stress that such large depth-related age changes are atypical in most clastic-rich sediments, in which self dose rates are Ͼ2 Gy/ka and the cosmic dose rate is, therefore, a much smaller fraction of the total R. The depth variations are significant to the age estimate of NHV1 because radioisotope-poor carbonates and quartz dominate this sediment, and therefore its self ␤ and ␥ dose rates are very low. They would be equally significant in other quartz-dominated, very mature sediments (Ivester et al, 2001). In any event, we suggest that the kurkar is cognate with the Dor Kurkar exposed at the Givat Olga section, which has yielded an average age of 54 Ϯ 9 ka based on IRSL dating of potassium feldspar grains (Frechen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussion Of Luminescence Agesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We stress that such large depth-related age changes are atypical in most clastic-rich sediments, in which self dose rates are Ͼ2 Gy/ka and the cosmic dose rate is, therefore, a much smaller fraction of the total R. The depth variations are significant to the age estimate of NHV1 because radioisotope-poor carbonates and quartz dominate this sediment, and therefore its self ␤ and ␥ dose rates are very low. They would be equally significant in other quartz-dominated, very mature sediments (Ivester et al, 2001). In any event, we suggest that the kurkar is cognate with the Dor Kurkar exposed at the Givat Olga section, which has yielded an average age of 54 Ϯ 9 ka based on IRSL dating of potassium feldspar grains (Frechen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussion Of Luminescence Agesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It yielded a mean D e ϭ 4.46 Ϯ 0.30 Gy ( M ϭ Ϯ0.09 Gy, n ϭ 10). The validity of the SAA method for dating quartz-rich sediments within the Epipaleolithic time frame was verified in an earlier study (Ivester et al, 2001). A past D e was obtained for each aliquot by extrapolation of a least squares fit of the preheat-corrected dose response growth curve, with inverse weighting with respect to intensity.…”
Section: E Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of using optical dating is that samples that have been exposed to only a few seconds of direct sunlight can be dated, which permits much younger samples to be dated than can be using TL. Optical dating has been crucial for providing chronologies for eolian activity in many parts of the world (e.g., Stokes and Gaylord, 1993;Ollerhead et al 1994;Stokes et al, 1997;Ivester et al, 2001;Arbogast et al, 2002;Chen et al, 2002;Forman and Pierson, 2002;Little et al, 2002;Thomas et al, 2002; this volume, among many others).…”
Section: Luminescence Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He states there were active dunes downstream of the PAW site in the Cape Fear River valley between ∼8300-6300 cal yr BP and in coastal Georgia ∼9500-4500 cal yr BP (Ivester et al, 2001). It is possible that dune reactivation occurred during the wet phase at PAW, and as Otvos points out the PAW site "lacks explicit aridity indicators."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our interpretation of these data differs from Otvos. The Holocene dune activity in Georgia was interpreted as sporadic and spatially limited reworking of crests of unusually thick riverine dunes and not related to renewed sedimentation of parabolic dune fields (Ivester et al, 2001). Further, the authors "do not know if the Holocene reworking is a result of climate change, localized fires, or human destabilization of the dune surface" (Ivester et al, 2001, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%