2005
DOI: 10.1537/ase.040622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronology of the Yayoi skeletal remains from the Kanto district, Japan: a preliminary re-evaluation by radiocarbon dating of postcranial material

Abstract: Radiocarbon ages were determined for 25 samples of human skeletal remains previously assigned or attributable to the Yayoi period (tentatively considered ca. 500 BC to 300 AD) of the Kanto district, Japan. Suzuki (1969) and others, predominantly on cranial morphology, recognized that the Kanto Yayoi series contains three morphological groups: the native Jomon, transitional, and Kofun types. Morphological variation of the Kanto Yayoi people was considered to be chronologically based and formed the basis of Suzu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine which of the skeletons from this site were those of the Okhotsk culture, the one of us (M.Y.) undertook the radiocarbon dating of the Moyoro series using NIES-TERRA, the accelerator facility of the Institute of Environmental Studies located in Tsukuba City, Japan (Yoneda et al, 2005;Matsumura et al, 2006 The comparative samples used in this study consist of the following 19 groups: Jomon, Hokkaido Ainu, Sakhalin Ainu, Yayoi, modern main-island Japanese, Kumejima, Northern Chinese, Aleut, Neolithic Baikalian, Buryat, Chukchi, Ekven (Iron Age), Asian Eskimo, Kazakh, Mongolian, Amur (Nanay, Negidal, Oroch, and Ulch), Nivkh, Russian, and Tagar (Iron Age, southern Siberia). The Jomon from the middle to latest periods (c. 5300-2300 BP) were mainly from the main Japanese islands of Hokkaido and Honshu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine which of the skeletons from this site were those of the Okhotsk culture, the one of us (M.Y.) undertook the radiocarbon dating of the Moyoro series using NIES-TERRA, the accelerator facility of the Institute of Environmental Studies located in Tsukuba City, Japan (Yoneda et al, 2005;Matsumura et al, 2006 The comparative samples used in this study consist of the following 19 groups: Jomon, Hokkaido Ainu, Sakhalin Ainu, Yayoi, modern main-island Japanese, Kumejima, Northern Chinese, Aleut, Neolithic Baikalian, Buryat, Chukchi, Ekven (Iron Age), Asian Eskimo, Kazakh, Mongolian, Amur (Nanay, Negidal, Oroch, and Ulch), Nivkh, Russian, and Tagar (Iron Age, southern Siberia). The Jomon from the middle to latest periods (c. 5300-2300 BP) were mainly from the main Japanese islands of Hokkaido and Honshu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2300-2340 BP (e.g. Kondo and Matsu'ura, 2005;Yoneda et al, 2005). It is generally agreed, based on cranial and dental morphology, that Jomon period populations are direct ancestors of the Hokkaido Ainu (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-way ANOVA tests for the effects of sex and population group (Jomon vs. modern Japanese) were performed on each of raw measurements, the indices, and the size-standardized values (calculated by b Yoneda et al (2005). c Yamasaki and Takahashi (2007).…”
Section: Assessment Of Endocranial Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%