2021
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronosequence of morphological change in a stream fish following impoundment

Abstract: Water impoundment is among the most prevalent and potent forms of anthropogenic environmental modification worldwide. Flow modification can drive morphological changes in riverine species that persist after dam closure, but little is known about the tempo and trajectory of phenotypic responses to impoundment. Through geometric morphometric analysis of natural history collections from behind Claiborne Lock and Dam (i.e. in Claiborne Lake reservoir) and nearby Chilatchee Creek (Alabama River Basin, Alabama, U.S.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population from lotic site 2 was represented by a larger head, a narrower caudal peduncle, and a deeper body as opposed to the population from site 1. Previous studies have reported that geographic distances or physical barriers (HPPs (constructed in 1966) and waterfall) between habitats [ 59 , 60 ] pose a major obstacle to gene flow [ 61 ; 62 ], hence increasing intraspecific morphological differences in various fish species [ 16 , 17 , 63 ]. This situation reduces the genetic diversity of populations above the barrier and even increases the genetic differentiation between populations above and below the barrier [ 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population from lotic site 2 was represented by a larger head, a narrower caudal peduncle, and a deeper body as opposed to the population from site 1. Previous studies have reported that geographic distances or physical barriers (HPPs (constructed in 1966) and waterfall) between habitats [ 59 , 60 ] pose a major obstacle to gene flow [ 61 ; 62 ], hence increasing intraspecific morphological differences in various fish species [ 16 , 17 , 63 ]. This situation reduces the genetic diversity of populations above the barrier and even increases the genetic differentiation between populations above and below the barrier [ 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%