2019
DOI: 10.15851/jap.v7n1.1491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chula Formula sebagai Prediktor Ketepatan Kedalaman Endotracheal Tube pada Intubasi Nasotracheal

Abstract: Intubasi nasotrakeal adalah salah satu metode yang umum digunakan pada operasi intraoral dan maksilofasial yang memiliki keunggulan untuk menyediakan akses yang lebih baik. Hal yang menjadi perhatian utama ketika memasukkan endotracheal tube (ETT) adalah penempatan yang tepat dan sesuai sehingga menghindari komplikasi akibat malposisi ETT. Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) adalah cara yang paling pasti untuk menilai penempatan ujung ETT karena menyediakan visualisasi secara langsung sehingga dapat mengukur penempa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average age was 40 years in this study, with the range of age was 18-65 years old. This study was conducted in patients age > 18 years old because airway anatomical structure involves the size of the head, nose, tongue, epiglottis, larynx, trachea, bronchus (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average age was 40 years in this study, with the range of age was 18-65 years old. This study was conducted in patients age > 18 years old because airway anatomical structure involves the size of the head, nose, tongue, epiglottis, larynx, trachea, bronchus (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shallow ETT can result in spontaneous extubation of the head movements and cause irritation or trauma to the vocal cords, leading to irritation, inflammation, or vocal cord ischemia. Deep ETT can cause ETT to enter one lung, occurring oxygenation disorder, leading to atelectasis and pneumothorax (14,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%