2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CI Camelopardalis: The first sgB[e]-high mass X-ray binary twenty years on: A supernova imposter in our own Galaxy?

Abstract: Context. The Galactic supergiant B[e] star CI Camelopardalis (CI Cam) was the first sgB[e] star detected during an X-ray outburst. The star brightened to ∼2 Crab in the X-ray regime (∼ 5 × 10 −8 ergs cm −2 s −1 in the 2-25 keV range) within hours before decaying to a quiescent level in less than 2 weeks, clearly indicative of binarity. Since the outburst of CI Cam, a number of sgB[e] stars have been identified as X-ray overluminous for a single star (i.e., L X > 10 −7 L bol ). This small population has recentl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These objects have been proposed to be binary systems, in which the high energy emission is caused by either accretion onto a compact object, or by shocks in a colliding wind binary with a second massive star. Members of this group are the Galactic objects Cl* Westerlund 1 W 9 (= Wd1-9), which is considered a colliding wind system ( [85]), CI Cam (= MWC 84), which might be interpreted as supernova imposter ( [187]), and the high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) IGR J16318-4848 in which the compact object was proposed to be a neutron star ( [188]). Two ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs), Holmberg II X-1 and NGC 300 ULX1, the latter being also named as supernova imposter SN2010da, have also been proposed to be HMXBs including a B[e]SG ( [189][190][191]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These objects have been proposed to be binary systems, in which the high energy emission is caused by either accretion onto a compact object, or by shocks in a colliding wind binary with a second massive star. Members of this group are the Galactic objects Cl* Westerlund 1 W 9 (= Wd1-9), which is considered a colliding wind system ( [85]), CI Cam (= MWC 84), which might be interpreted as supernova imposter ( [187]), and the high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) IGR J16318-4848 in which the compact object was proposed to be a neutron star ( [188]). Two ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs), Holmberg II X-1 and NGC 300 ULX1, the latter being also named as supernova imposter SN2010da, have also been proposed to be HMXBs including a B[e]SG ( [189][190][191]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These objects have been proposed to be binary systems, in which the high energy emission is caused by either accretion onto a compact object, or by shocks in a colliding wind binary with a second massive star. Members of this group are the Galactic objects Cl* Westerlund 1 W 9 (=Wd1-9), which is considered a colliding wind system [85]; CI Cam (=MWC 84), which might be interpreted as supernova imposter [187]; and the high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) IGR J16318-4848, in which the compact object was proposed to be a neutron star [188]. Two ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs), Holmberg II X-1 and NGC 300 ULX1, the latter being also named as supernova imposter SN2010da, have also been proposed to be HMXBs including a B[e]SG [189][190][191].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaty et al (2019) suggest that sgB[e] HMXBs are at the short evolutionary stage when a binary system is entering a common envelope phase of binary evolution. At present, this is a small class of rare HMXBs that, besides the Galactic sources CI Cam, IGR J16318−4848, and Wd1-9, includes a couple of candidates in the Magellanic Clouds and, remarkably, two ultra luminous X-ray sources, Holmberg II X-1 and NGC300 ULX-1/supernova imposter SN2010da (Bartlett et al 2019).…”
Section: Is Ax J17141−3912 a Supergiant B[e] Hmxb?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CI Cam and IGR J16318−4848 show variable absorbing column densities in the range 10 23 -10 24 cm −2 , intense FeKα line emission and X-ray flux variability (Bartlett et al 2019). But while IGR J16318-4848 is bright above 20 keV (Bird et al 2016) with some level of flaring activity (Sidoli & Paizis 2018), CI Cam has never been detected by INT EGRAL (Bird et al 2016).…”
Section: Is Ax J17141−3912 a Supergiant B[e] Hmxb?mentioning
confidence: 99%