2022
DOI: 10.17162/au.v12i3.1112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ciberbullying en estudiantes desde el perfil de víctima en el contexto de la pandemia

Abstract: El estudio analiza la frecuencia y las conductas de ciberbullying en estudiantes de educación secundaria según sexo, edad, grado de estudios, tenencia de telefonía móvil y conexión a Internet en este dispositivo, desde el perfil de la víctima. La muestra fue constituida por 381 estudiantes de educación secundaria de las instituciones educativas públicas de la selva central del Perú, cuyas edades están comprendidas entre 15 y 18 años (M = 15.90 años; DT = 0.88). Para el recojo de datos se utilizó un instrumento… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the most common types of cyber-victimization affecting adolescents were receiving annoying calls in order to upset or mock; and the sending, posting, or sharing of harmful or false photos and videos by mobile phone or Internet (Herrera-López, Romera & Ortega-Ruiz, 2018;Orosco, Gómez, Pomasunco & Torres, 2022). On the other hand, the least frequent types of cyber-victimization were repeated threats, happy slapping, or exclusion from social networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the most common types of cyber-victimization affecting adolescents were receiving annoying calls in order to upset or mock; and the sending, posting, or sharing of harmful or false photos and videos by mobile phone or Internet (Herrera-López, Romera & Ortega-Ruiz, 2018;Orosco, Gómez, Pomasunco & Torres, 2022). On the other hand, the least frequent types of cyber-victimization were repeated threats, happy slapping, or exclusion from social networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%