2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cigarette craving is associated with blunted reward processing in nicotine-dependent smokers

Abstract: Background Dysfunctional reward processing leading to the undervaluation of non-drug rewards is hypothesized to play a crucial role in nicotine dependence. However, it is unclear if blunted reward responsivity and the desire to use nicotine are directly linked after a brief period of abstinence. Such an association would suggest that individuals with reduced reward responsivity may be at increased risk to experience nicotine craving. Methods Reward function was evaluated with a probabilistic reward task (PRT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second explanation is that depressed smokers are more sensitive to a wide range of correlated adverse triggers for smoking. In fact, a wide range of adverse states (in addition to negative affect and abstinence) have been shown to augment tobacco motivation including stress/anxiety (Owens et al, 2014), rumination (Dvorak et al, 2011), anger/hostility (Quinn et al, 2014; Zuo et al, 2016), cognitive dysfunction (Hall et al, 2015), fatigue/sleepiness (Hamidovic and de Wit, 2009) and reward hyposensitivity (Peechatka et al, 2015). Although it remains to be tested whether depressed smokers are more sensitive to all of these adverse triggers, our finding that they are more sensitive to both mood induction and abstinence suggests this may be the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second explanation is that depressed smokers are more sensitive to a wide range of correlated adverse triggers for smoking. In fact, a wide range of adverse states (in addition to negative affect and abstinence) have been shown to augment tobacco motivation including stress/anxiety (Owens et al, 2014), rumination (Dvorak et al, 2011), anger/hostility (Quinn et al, 2014; Zuo et al, 2016), cognitive dysfunction (Hall et al, 2015), fatigue/sleepiness (Hamidovic and de Wit, 2009) and reward hyposensitivity (Peechatka et al, 2015). Although it remains to be tested whether depressed smokers are more sensitive to all of these adverse triggers, our finding that they are more sensitive to both mood induction and abstinence suggests this may be the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An fMRI study revealed that smokers exhibited lower brain reactivity, especially in reward-related brain regions (e.g., caudate and putamen), to nontobacco rewardrelated stimuli (e.g., favorite food) compared with nonsmokers 15 . Another study investigated the association between the severity of nicotine dependence and the response to monetary rewards and found that the intensity of nicotine craving among smokers was linked to lower sensitivity to nondrug-related rewards 16 . The threshold of reward has been shown to increase as addiction develops, expressed by higher drug tolerance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the very high prevalence of smoking (more than 60%) in subjects with schizophrenia (Chapman, Ragg, & McGeechan, ) and their greater difficulties in quitting smoking (Wing, Wass, Soh, & George, ), a more precise understanding of the common neurobiological basis of schizophrenia and nicotine dependence is of particular importance. Several investigations have emphasized the potential usage of tobacco by schizophrenia patients for self‐medication purposes in order to alleviate specific symptoms (Lucatch, Lowe, Clark, Kozak, & George, ), particularly negative symptoms and dysfunctional reward circuits (Peechatka, Whitton, Farmer, Pizzagalli, & Janes, ). However, investigations in this field have yielded mixed findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%