Cigarette dependence and depressive symptoms as predictors of smoking status at five-year follow-up after a workplace smoking cessation program

Nieva, Gemma; Comín, Marina; Valero, Sergi; Bruguera, Eugeni

doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.04.003

Cited by 7 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the nine included studies, five were randomized controlled trials that compared two different forms of intervention (Asfar et al, 2020;Caponnetto et al, 2020;Mache et al, 2019;van den Brand et al, 2018van den Brand et al, , 2020 and four were cohort studies (Moses et al, 2020;Nieva et al, 2017;Paul et al, 2013;Schult et al, 2016) (Table 1). Follow-up time points ranged from 3 to 12 months, except for Nieva et al (2017) with a follow-up period of 5 years. This longer follow-up period allowed Nieva et al (2017) to explore rates of continued tobacco abstinence.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most commonly, interventions at the individual level included individual counseling (i.e., motivational interviewing [MI] and goal setting) (Asfar et al, 2020;Caponnetto et al, 2020;Mache et al, 2019;Nieva et al, 2017;Schult et al, 2016). Several of these interventions also paired individual counseling with pharmacological tobacco cessation aids, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (Asfar et al, 2020;Nieva et al, 2017). Three interventions also included individual-level financial incentives (i.e., direct payment or lower cost health plan) and reported high participation at follow-up (Moses et al, 2020;van den Brand et al, 2018van den Brand et al, , 2020.…”

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Institutional interventions typically included providing company time to attend tobacco cessation programs offered to the individual or the group (Asfar et al, 2020;Caponnetto et al, 2020;Mache et al, 2019;Nieva et al, 2017;Paul et al, 2013;van den Brand et al, 2018van den Brand et al, , 2020 or covering some cost associated with the program (e.g., the cost of NRTs) (Asfar et al, 2020;Moses et al, 2020;Nieva et al, 2017;Schult et al, 2016). Interestingly, none of the reviewed studies included an institutional intervention that altered any aspect of the workplace environment.…”

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interestingly, Caponnetto et al (2020) noted that although providing interventions during work time was seen as a facilitator, it was often still difficult to convince employees to attend training at the workplace, which the authors hypothesized could be due to unmeasured factors such as negative peer pressure or individual motivation. Nieva et al (2017) highlighted the impacts of mental health as a barrier to smoking cessation, emphasizing that depressive symptoms influenced abstinence and quit rates. Another significant barrier mentioned by Nieva et al (2017) were the costs associated with continuing the intervention.…”

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Facilitators An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another significant barrier mentioned by Nieva et al (2017) were the costs associated with continuing the intervention. Nieva et al (2017) indicated that interventions could be costly for the workplace, and the ongoing expenses may impact whether an employer chose to continue the smoking cessation intervention.…”

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Facilitators An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Exploring Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Interventions: A Scoping Review

Parkinson

Jessiman-Perreault

Frenette

et al. 2022

Workplace Health Saf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The workplace provides a unique opportunity to intervene on tobacco use, by implementing multilevel interventions engaging diverse employees. Using the social ecological model (SEM), this scoping review aimed to synthesize descriptions of multilevel workplace tobacco control programs to create a health equity informed framework for intervention planning. Methods: Multiple databases were searched for articles published from January 2010 to December 2020 meeting inclusion criteria (i.e., discussed multilevel tobacco cessation interventions that intervene, target, or incorporate two or more levels of influence, and one of the levels must be the workplace). Articles were screened by two independent researchers and included if they discussed multilevel tobacco cessation interventions that intervened, targeted, or incorporated two or more levels of influence. To integrate the extracted information into the SEM, we utilized the McLeroy et al. model and definitions to describe potential multilevel interventions and their determinants. Results: Nine articles were included in this review. No studies intervened across all five levels (individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy), and the most common levels of intervention were individual (e.g., individual counseling), interpersonal (e.g., group therapy), and institutional (e.g., interventions during work hours). Participation rates varied by key social determinants of health (SDOHs) such as age, gender, education and income. Barriers including cost and sustainability influenced successful implementation, while leadership endorsement and accessibility facilitated successful implementation. Discussion/Application to Practice: Multilevel interventions targeting at least two SEM levels may reduce persistent health inequities if they address how SDOHs influence individual health behaviors. Employee characteristics impacted the success of tobacco cessation interventions, but more research is needed to understand the barriers and facilitators related to workplace characteristics.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Facilitators An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Program Facilitators An...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Exploring Multilevel Workplace Tobacco Control Interventions: A Scoping Review

Parkinson

Jessiman-Perreault

Frenette

et al. 2022

Workplace Health Saf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Smoking cessation for improving mental health

Taylor

Lindson

Farley

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policyWhile the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

show abstract