2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ciliogenesis membrane dynamics and organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they suggested that these cilia were stable through both meiotic divisions in dividing spermatocytes with yet unknown functions [50]. Therefore, it seems that, although somatic primary cilia in vertebrates are a sensory machinery during interphase which was considered a “sleeping beauty” to date during cell division [51, 52], cells that undergo meiosis are capable of polymerizing cilia once cell division has started. This may be related to the dynamics of the mitotic versus the meiotic centrosome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they suggested that these cilia were stable through both meiotic divisions in dividing spermatocytes with yet unknown functions [50]. Therefore, it seems that, although somatic primary cilia in vertebrates are a sensory machinery during interphase which was considered a “sleeping beauty” to date during cell division [51, 52], cells that undergo meiosis are capable of polymerizing cilia once cell division has started. This may be related to the dynamics of the mitotic versus the meiotic centrosome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it suggested that these cilia were stable through both meiotic divisions in dividing spermatocytes with yet unknown functions [59]. Therefore, it appears that, although somatic primary cilia in vertebrates are sensory machinery during interphase, which was considered a "sleeping beauty" to date during cell division [60,61], cells that undergo meiosis are capable of polymerizing cilia once cell division has started. This may be related to the dynamics of the mitotic versus the meiotic centrosome.…”
Section: The Meiotic Cilium In Mouse Spermatogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lists of genes associated with specific centrosomal/ciliary functional modules and their presence or otherwise within the ciliary cluster, compiled from recent reviews and primary research publications: Centriolar and PCM components (Jana, 2021); distal and sub-distal appendages (Tischer et al, 2021); transition zone (Garcia-Gonzalo and Reiter, 2017), IFT kinesin and IFT-A/B (Klena and Pigino, 2022), IFT dynein, inner and outer dynein arms, DNAAFs and MIPs (Braschi et al, 2022), the BBSome (Wingfield et al, 2018), ciliary membrane trafficking (Zhao et al, 2023), the N-DRC (Bower et al, 2013), radial spokes 1 and 2 (Gui et al, 2021), radial spoke 3 (Bazan et al, 2021;Urbanska et al, 2015), central apparatus (Gui et al, 2022), and centriolar satellites (Prosser and Pelletier, 2020). (C)…”
Section: Supplemental Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cildb V3.0 number of ciliary evidences (Arnaiz et al, 2014) were collected for each human gene from http://cildb.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr. ( B ) Lists of genes associated with specific centrosomal/ciliary functional modules and their presence or otherwise within the ciliary cluster, compiled from recent reviews and primary research publications: Centriolar and PCM components (Jana, 2021); distal and sub-distal appendages (Tischer et al, 2021); transition zone (Garcia-Gonzalo and Reiter, 2017), IFT kinesin and IFT-A/B (Klena and Pigino, 2022), IFT dynein, inner and outer dynein arms, DNAAFs and MIPs (Braschi et al, 2022), the BBSome (Wingfield et al, 2018), ciliary membrane trafficking (Zhao et al, 2023), the N-DRC (Bower et al, 2013), radial spokes 1 and 2 (Gui et al, 2021), radial spoke 3 (Bazan et al, 2021; Urbanska et al, 2015), central apparatus (Gui et al, 2022), and centriolar satellites (Prosser and Pelletier, 2020). ( C ) Comparison of ciliary cluster with the original comparative analyses performed in 2004 (Avidor-Reiss et al ., 2004; Li et al ., 2004) and the output of the more recent phylogenetic profiling studies (Dey et al ., 2015; Li et al ., 2014; Nevers et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Supplemental Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%