2023
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2303379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cilta-cel or Standard Care in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The least-efficient outcome is for a patient to die during the vein-to-vein delay. Both clinical trial and real-world data suggest that 10% of patients will never receive their CAR T-cell therapy, implying that a “sickest first” strategy will lead to unacceptable levels of wasted patient-specific therapies. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that patients with disease characteristics that portend the highest risk of death without CAR T-cell therapy—those with higher disease stage, high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, and prior BCMA-directed therapies—are the ones who also appear to benefit less from BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy even if they do not die during the vein-to-vein delay …”
Section: Avoid Arbitrarily Prioritizing Subcategories Of Eligible Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The least-efficient outcome is for a patient to die during the vein-to-vein delay. Both clinical trial and real-world data suggest that 10% of patients will never receive their CAR T-cell therapy, implying that a “sickest first” strategy will lead to unacceptable levels of wasted patient-specific therapies. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that patients with disease characteristics that portend the highest risk of death without CAR T-cell therapy—those with higher disease stage, high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, and prior BCMA-directed therapies—are the ones who also appear to benefit less from BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy even if they do not die during the vein-to-vein delay …”
Section: Avoid Arbitrarily Prioritizing Subcategories Of Eligible Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black individuals are at a higher risk for multiple myeloma and comprise approximately 20% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma cases in the US; yet, only 4.5% of participants in trials included in new drug application submissions for multiple myeloma indications between 2003 and 2017 were Black . This underrepresentation of Black individuals extends to CAR T-cell therapy trials in multiple myeloma . This will likely apply to the clinical distribution of CAR T-cell therapy due to (1) lack of or delayed referral, (2) unconscious physician bias, (3) lack of social support and/or transportation, and (4) institutionalized barriers from under- or uninsurance.…”
Section: Mitigate Health Inequities By Reserving Appointments For Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…been treated in real-world clinical practice, and this number is expected to increase substantially as randomized controlled trials establish a role for CAR-T cells in earlier lines of therapy. [11][12][13][14] Promising breakthroughs in the treatment of solid organ malignancies and autoimmune diseases raise hope that CAR-T cell therapy may play an even broader role in the future. 15,16 CAR-T cell therapy is associated with well-known early toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and immune effectorcell associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), the assessment and management of which have been thoroughly described in consensus guidelines by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%