CIO reporting structure and firm strategic orientation – a content analysis approach

Abstract

Purpose Grounded in the principal-agent theory, this study aims to develop and test hypotheses too, investigate how the firm’s strategic orientations, namely, innovation, growth, differentiation and cost leadership impact the chief information officer (CIO) reporting relationship and structure. Design/methodology/approach The study uses content analysis to analyze a data set of press releases collected from the LexisNexis Academic wire index. The press releases were issued by firms when they hired CIOs between 2003 and 2007, yielding 128 firms, which had specific information about the CIO reporting relationship and structure. Findings The results reveal that firms seeking an innovation, growth or differentiation strategy have their CIOs reporting to the chief executive officer. Research limitations/implications The current study is motivated by the desire to replicate and extend the works of previous researchers who have assessed various CIO issues. Replication takes several forms such as the use of similar or different data sets, different research environments or reinvestigating research concepts through a different theoretical lens. This study makes use of a multi-firm data set spanning five years and the principal-agent theory as the theoretical framework to explore the CIO reporting relationship and structure. Although this study focuses on the hiring trends and the strategic orientations of the firms, future studies should explore other characteristics associated with the CIOs that might have an impact on the reporting relationship such as the years of experience, age, educational background of CIOs and information technology budgets. Practical implications The existing literature has not settled the debate as to whom the CIO should be reporting to and understanding the reporting relationships is important because, in many firms, the organizational structures and the reporting relationships are indicative of the power dynamics and how the organizational resources are controlled and shared. Originality/value Replication studies are important because they confirm, reinforce, extend and provide reliability to the paradigms and knowledge in the discipline, as well as offer reliability of the results upon which scientific progress is based.

Symbolic and substantive compliance communication about pregnant students’ rights and access to services among Texas public postsecondary institutions.

“…Content analysis has been used with syllabi to examine academic course content in a range of disciplines including social work (Maschi et al, 2019;Mehrotra et al, 2017), public administration (King et al, 2021), and psychology (Merced et al, 2018). Syllabi have also been used to examine concepts more broadly such as learner/learningcenteredness (Donnelly & Winkelmann, 2021;Karanja & Grant, 2020); diversity, equity, and inclusion (Gallo et al, 2022); and academic honesty (Augers & Waters, 2020;Welch, 2005).…”

Using Curriculum Mapping to Understand Information Literacy in Political Science Curricula

“…32 The study conducted by Erastus Karanja and Donna Grant aims to provide a similar content analysis of learner-centered syllabi, and their results also indicate low scores in learning communities, assessments, and assignments. 33 Writing SLOs as described in the literature leads to the development of learner-centered syllabi, a practice in which faculty should engage to help with this shift to learner-centered praxis. in this discipline-specific map.…”

Design and implementation of a smart learning environment for teaching computer networking

“…Ideally, teachers should take the role of mentors or supporters (the guide on the side) in this student-centred approach, rather than their primary instructor role (the sage on the stage) seen in the teacher-centred traditional approach (Dabbagh & Bannan-Ritland, 2005;King, 1993). Some success has been obtained with problem-based learning (as a type of active learning) in designing instruction that embraces the practical (lab) activities for computer networking (de Oliveira & dos Santos, 2018; Linge & Parsons, 2006), but there are a number of approaches that can be applied with student-centred learning in mind (Karanja & Grant, 2020).…”