2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CiPA: Ongoing testing, future qualification procedures, and pending issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparable situation applies to the extrapolation of QT prolongation from controlled clinical trials to a real‐life setting (Chain et al , ). This should be carefully considered by those supporting the CiPA working groups, who are currently responsible for the development and implementation of alternative guidelines for ICH S7B, which will ultimately guide the ranking of compounds in terms of their pro‐arrhythmic risk (Cavero and Holzgrefe, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparable situation applies to the extrapolation of QT prolongation from controlled clinical trials to a real‐life setting (Chain et al , ). This should be carefully considered by those supporting the CiPA working groups, who are currently responsible for the development and implementation of alternative guidelines for ICH S7B, which will ultimately guide the ranking of compounds in terms of their pro‐arrhythmic risk (Cavero and Holzgrefe, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, at the conference of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium (CSRC)–Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI)–Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held in July 2013, a revision of ICH S7B and possible elimination of ICH‐E14 were proposed. The proposal is aimed at shifting the focus from evaluating QT prolongation to evaluating the pro‐arrhythmic activity of a compound using a comprehensive in vitro pro‐arrhythmia assay (CiPA) (Cavero and Holzgrefe, ; Sager et al , ; Fermini et al , ). The approach seems, however, to overlook the importance of a stricter quantitative framework for the translation of in vitro findings and in particular of the potential differences between in vitro and in vivo concentration–effect [pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD)] relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 Expert working groups are tasked with developing and testing detailed protocols for each of the 3 components, which will be validated by testing 29 established drugs spanning the range from low to high proarrhythmic liability. 95,96 Once established, CiPA may remove the need for expensive Thorough QT studies for most drug candidates.…”
Section: Integrated Cardiac Safety Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of investigating these side effects is emphasized by regulatory guidelines and documents currently in development. 2 High-throughput screening assays for ion channels have been established in pharmaceutical companies using indirect readout technologies, often with fluorescent assays, e.g., by monitoring the change of the cellular potential with potentiometric dyes, or by fluorescence-labeling known ligands. 3 These methods provide an indirect measure of ion channel function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Recently the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) started a new initiative to evaluate the potential for integrated non-clinical cardiac ion channel activity assessment to predict the clinical pro-arrhythmic risk of drugs. 2,25 Included in this is the evaluation of the use of pluripotent stem cell applications for cardiovascular risk assessment. So far, the Patchliner has been used successfully to record from mouse embryonic stem cells (CorAt, Axiogenesis), 10 human iPS cells from CDI, 14,26 Axiogenesis (Cor.4U) 26 ), and Cellectis ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%