“…Not surprisingly, then, research on the effects of differing chronotypes on college student behavior has been conducted at numerous universities in the United States as well as many other countries, including Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Ethiopia, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, Lebanon, Nigeria, Norway, Peru, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey. These studies have examined such diverse issues as general academic performance and achievement (e.g., Beşoluk, Önder, & Deveci, ; Borisenkov, Perminova, & Kosova, ; Medeiros, Mendes, Lima, & Araujo, ; Song & Stough, ), sleep habits and patterns (e.g., Azevedo et al, ; Cofer et al, ; Concepcion et al, ; Kabrita, Hajjar‐Muca, & Duffy, ; Medeiros et al, ; Park, Matsumoto, Seo, Shinkoda, & Park, ; Robinson et al, ; Tavernier & Willoughby, ; Urner et al, ; Yadav & Singh, ; Zimmermann, ), the influence of external synchronizers (e.g., Teixeira et al, ), physical performance (Vitale, Calogiuri, & Weydahl, ) and issues related to health, problem and at‐risk behaviors, and psychological disorders (e.g., Abasiubong, Abiola, & Udofia, ; Culnan, Kloss, & Grandner, ; Digdon & Howell, ; Digdon & Landry, ; Haregu et al, ; Lin & Gau, ; Randler, Horzum, & Vollmer, ; Randler & Vollmer, ; Tavernier & Willoughby, ; Whittier et al, ).…”