1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02899550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circadian variation in cell proliferation and maturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect is more pronounced for the MR than for the LI. The results support the theory of Refsum et al (17) that even regeneration depends on a diurnal synchronizing factor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The effect is more pronounced for the MR than for the LI. The results support the theory of Refsum et al (17) that even regeneration depends on a diurnal synchronizing factor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In vivo, signals mediated by the central nervous system are believed to stimulate cell proliferation. This stimulus is possibly regulated by locally acting growth-inhibitors, chalones, which are produced by the mature cell compartment of the corneal epithelium (Iversen 1981; Refsum et al 1991). The in vitro observation of an increased proliferation of corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells in the control eyes, accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in the number of cells per vision field, may be explained by loss of the mature cell population and delayed maturation of epithelial cells, leading to a decrease in locally produced growth-inhibitory substances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…migration followed by DNA-synthesis and mitotic activity (Haaskjold et al 1989). In vivo studies of the normal and regenerating rat corneal epithelium have demonstrated a prominent circadian variation, which possibly is controlled by the central nervous system (Refsum et al 1991). Recently, cell-kinetic studies of the proliferative responses in corneal, limbal, and conjunctival cell populations have suggested that these epithelia are influenced by the same growth-suppressing factors (Haaskjold et al 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%