2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00124.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circadian Variations in the Occurrence of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Abstract: A circadian distribution has been demonstrated in episodes of sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular premature complexes, heart rate variability, and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the circadian distribution of ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes in a population of ICD patients. Data were gathered from 72 patients (55 men, 17 women; mean age 62.7 +/- 12.2 years, mean LVEF 0.0037 +/- 0.0011) with ICDs implanted for standard indications. Patients were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, as discussed previously, the use of 9-1-1 call time as a surrogate for actual time of cardiac arrest can be inaccurate and thus has the potential for misclassification bias, for example, by falsely classifying patients who died at night to have arrested (and died) in the morning. Although assessment of the time of arrest from implantable cardiac defibrillator electrograms may be more accurate, 32 these have limited generalizability because of selection bias in the type of patients who tend to have these devices implanted. Fifth, we were unable to relate timing of cardiac arrest to patient behaviors such as wake time, physical activities, or medication compliance or to the type of cardiac arrest (eg, myocardial infarction or primarily arrhythmic).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, as discussed previously, the use of 9-1-1 call time as a surrogate for actual time of cardiac arrest can be inaccurate and thus has the potential for misclassification bias, for example, by falsely classifying patients who died at night to have arrested (and died) in the morning. Although assessment of the time of arrest from implantable cardiac defibrillator electrograms may be more accurate, 32 these have limited generalizability because of selection bias in the type of patients who tend to have these devices implanted. Fifth, we were unable to relate timing of cardiac arrest to patient behaviors such as wake time, physical activities, or medication compliance or to the type of cardiac arrest (eg, myocardial infarction or primarily arrhythmic).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the sensitivity of our result to repeated shocks in the same patient, we repeated the analysis only including the first shock experienced by each patient. Finally, because patients are unlikely to drive during the nighttime hours between 12 AM to 6 AM when the risk of an ICD shock is lowest (19,20), we performed a sensitivity analysis that excluded this nighttime period from the case-crossover analysis. In this analysis, we conservatively assume that none of the patients were exposed to driving during this time period.…”
Section: Figure 1 Hazard Periods For Case-crossover Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of ischemic patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) evidence a morning peak and a secondary afternoon peak [1,2]. Similar circadian pattern has been noted in acute myocardial infarction [3] and stroke [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%