2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2016.7757381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circuit diagrams vs. physical circuits: The effect of representational forms during assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… through including physical circuits into assessments, educators could identify more accurately if students have the deep seeded misconception of sequential reasoning or other language of concept gaps (DESPORTES et al, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… through including physical circuits into assessments, educators could identify more accurately if students have the deep seeded misconception of sequential reasoning or other language of concept gaps (DESPORTES et al, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, and at the simplest level, describing the test & measurement equipment, how they are used, what is their impact on the circuit behavior, and understanding different representational forms, i.e. circuit diagrams vs. physical circuits [1], among others. Notice also, that hands-on experiments can be done in traditional laboratories, where students are able to directly manipulate the components and test & measurement equipment, or remotely, through remote labs [2][3]5].…”
Section: B Experiments With Electrical Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in some situations it is not feasible to measure the current in all possible circuit locations, because of technical limitations. This means there is a first class of errors not related to students' misunderstandings but rather to limitations related to VISIR 1 .…”
Section: A Framework For Interpreting Experimental Errors In Visirmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methodologies for finding misconceptions varied amongst the literature. Of the 15 articles included in the review, 9[7][17][18][19][20][23][24][26][28] analyzed misconceptions only using diagnostic tests, where a multiple choice, short-answer, or a combination test was administered to students and the answers were analyzed. A combination of a diagnostic exam with an interview was used by 4 articles[9][13][15]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%