“…In practice, all the QCM sensor characterization techniques provide, among other relevant parameters, the resonance frequency shift of the sensor Eichelbaum et al, 1999): network or impedance analysis is used to sweep the resonance frequency range of the resonator and determine the maximum conductance frequency (Schröder et al, 2001;Doerner et al, 2003), which is almost equivalent to the motional series resonance frequency of the resonator-sensor; impulse excitation and decay method techniques are used to determine the series-resonance or the parallel-resonance frequency depending on the measuring set-up (Rodahl & Kasemo, 1996); oscillator techniques are used for a continuous monitoring of a frequency which corresponds to a specific phase shift of the sensor in the resonance bandwidth (Ehahoun et al, 2002;Barnes, 1992;Wessendorf, 1993;Borngräber et al, 2002;Martin et al, 1997), this frequency can be used, in many applications, as reference of the resonance frequency of the sensor; and the lock-in techniques, which can be considered as sophisticated oscillators, are designed for a continuous monitoring of the motional series resonance frequency or the maximum conductance frequency of the resonator-sensor (Arnau et al, 2002(Arnau et al, , 2007Ferrari et al, 2001Ferrari et al, , 2006Jakoby et al, 2005;Riesch & Jakoby 2007). In order to assure that the frequency shift is the only parameter of interest, a second parameter providing information of the constancy of the properties of liquid medium is of interest, mainly in piezoelectric biosensors; this parameter depends on the characterization system being: the maximum conductance or the conductance bandwidth in impedance analysis, the dissipation factor in decay methods and a voltage associated with the sensor damping in oscillator techniques The different characterization methods mentioned can be classified in two types: 1) those which passively interrogate the sensor, and 2) those in which the sensor forms part of the characterization system.…”