1974
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circuit Models of the Passive Electrical Properties of Frog Skeletal Muscle Fibers

Abstract: The relation between the fine structure, electric field equations, and electric circuit models of skeletal muscle fibers is discussed. Experimental evidence illustrates the profound variation of potential with circumferential position, even at low frequencies (100 Hz). Since one-dimensional cable theory cannot account for such variation, three-dimensional cable theory must be used. Several circuit models of a sarcomere are presented and plots are made of the predicted phase angle between sinusoidal applied cur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 led to a passive radial space constant of three fiber diameters and a membrane resistance of 1 kf~ 2 for both the surface and tubular membrane. These values are in good agreement with the previous analyses of the passive equivalent circuit of frog skeletal muscle (Falk & Fatt, 1964;Schneider, 1970;Valdiosera, Clausen & Eisenberg, 1974b). For the frequencyrange of the present measurements, the passive shell model has been shown to agree satisfactorily with the exact solution of the appropriate cable equations (Peachy & Adrian, 1973).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…2 led to a passive radial space constant of three fiber diameters and a membrane resistance of 1 kf~ 2 for both the surface and tubular membrane. These values are in good agreement with the previous analyses of the passive equivalent circuit of frog skeletal muscle (Falk & Fatt, 1964;Schneider, 1970;Valdiosera, Clausen & Eisenberg, 1974b). For the frequencyrange of the present measurements, the passive shell model has been shown to agree satisfactorily with the exact solution of the appropriate cable equations (Peachy & Adrian, 1973).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that the estimates of the parameter standard deviations are computed from a linearization of the model about the best-fit parameter set (see Hamilton, 1964). They do not reflect a true confidence interval for each parameter due to the nonlinear dependence of the impedance on each parameter (see Valdiosera, Clausen & Eisenberg, 1974 (R~,) of the crypt lumen becomes comparable to the apical membrane impedance ation estimate indicates that a parameter is poorly determined. For this reason, data were excluded from further analysis if any parameter had a standard deviation which exceeded the best-fit value for that parameter by more than 10%.…”
Section: Transepithelial Impedance Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They do not reflect a true confidence interval for each parameter value due to the nonlinear dependence of the impedance on each parameter (see Valdiosera et al, 1974).…”
Section: Determination Of the Membrane Circuit Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%