1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02684392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulant block-factorization preconditioning of anisotropic elliptic problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach relies on the embedding of the model problem into a periodic problem. Similar ideas have also been explored in works on circulant preconditioners for elliptic problems [4,5] and also for preconditioning the indefinite Helmholtz equation [6]. We introduce a class of operators called LFA-compatible operators here and prove that for such operators the LFA gives the exact multigrid convergence factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our approach relies on the embedding of the model problem into a periodic problem. Similar ideas have also been explored in works on circulant preconditioners for elliptic problems [4,5] and also for preconditioning the indefinite Helmholtz equation [6]. We introduce a class of operators called LFA-compatible operators here and prove that for such operators the LFA gives the exact multigrid convergence factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Remark If the fine‐grid operator is block‐circulant with circulant blocks (BCCB), each block of can be diagonalized using Fourier modes. Thus, in the BCCB case, SAMA coincides with rigorous Fourier analysis. Remark While SAMA is most naturally considered for the BTCB case, we focus primarily on the special case of BTTB, where the Toeplitz blocks are diagonalized exactly by the sine Fourier basis. Remark The use of circulant or block‐circulant‐structured preconditioners for non‐circulant problems has a long history , but is primarily focused on the case of problems that retain elliptic character; here, we consider the space‐time discretization of parabolic problems, for which simple (multilevel) circulant preconditioners do not yield good performance.…”
Section: Semi‐algebraic Mode Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of circulant or block-circulant-structured preconditioners for non-circulant problems has a long history [51,52], but is primarily focused on the case of problems that retain elliptic character; here, we consider the space-time discretization of parabolic problems, for which simple (multilevel) circulant preconditioners do not yield good performance.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative condition number of the CBF preconditioner for the model (Laplace) 3D problem is analyzed using the technique from [5] and the following estimate is derived:…”
Section: Circulant Block Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%