2022
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2022100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular average relative to fractal measures

Abstract: <p style='text-indent:20px;'>We prove new <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ L^p $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ L^q $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> estimates for averages over dilates of the circle with respect to fractal measures, which unify different types of maximal estimates for the circular average. Our results are consequences of <inline-formula><te… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known that Marstrand's results [20] can be deduced from L p , p = ∞, estimate for the circular maximal function. In [12], some of the authors extended the L p circular maximal estimate to that relative to α-dimensional measures, which recovers the aforementioned Wolff's result in [33]. Moreover, L p maximal bound was extended to space curves (see [28,16,1,17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It is well-known that Marstrand's results [20] can be deduced from L p , p = ∞, estimate for the circular maximal function. In [12], some of the authors extended the L p circular maximal estimate to that relative to α-dimensional measures, which recovers the aforementioned Wolff's result in [33]. Moreover, L p maximal bound was extended to space curves (see [28,16,1,17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In the paper [HKL22], it was conjectured that (1.8) holds for any p > 4 − α when 1 < α ≤ 2, which was proved for α ≥ 3 − √ 3. This conjecture would imply L p (R 2 )-estimates for the maximal function S T for compact T ⊂ R 2 with finite s-dimensional upper Minkowski content for every 0 ≤ s < 1 and p > 2 + s, which would be sharp except possibly for endpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, it is possible to obtain L p -bounds for a smaller range of exponents p by using the local smoothing estimates for the wave equation, which is enough to deduce Corollary 1.12. We learned this observation from the authors of [HKL22]. There is a related result due to Wolff [Wol00] and Oberlin [Obe06] (see also [Mit99]): a Borel set containing a set of spheres of Hausdorff dimension larger than 1 (as a subset of R n × R + ) must have positive Lebesgue measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the exponents pn,k decrease with k, it is natural to explore if higher orders of multilinearity imply further progress on Conjecture 1.1. This line of investigation was considered by Lee [23] for n = 2 using the trilinear reduction of Lee and Vargas [25]; see also the recent work [17]. In this note, we further extend the multilinear approach to any dimension and any level of linearity in the case q > p. We remark that whereas partial results for q = p using this method were discussed in [8], our focus is on sharp results with q > p. Rather than working with k-linear estimates, we will work with their k-broad variants (see §3), which hold in the full range p ≥ pn,k .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%