2022
DOI: 10.1002/bse.3311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular business models and the environment: Maturity levels of the circular economy and innovation in greener craft breweries

Abstract: This article aims to highlight the level of maturity of the circular economy according to the ReSOLVE framework, the level of maturity of technical and biological cycles, and the level of maturity of sustaining and disruptive innovation in Brazilian and Portuguese craft brewing companies. Through a multiple case study in the craft brewery sector in the state of Santa Catarina (Brazil) and in the city of Porto (Portugal), a qualitative study was developed by means of a documentary analysis of secondary data, te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, contributing to the literature on the multidimensional nature of trade‐offs in sustainability‐rooted firms (DiVito & Bohnsack, 2017), we identify three typologies of trade‐offs (i.e., low‐hanging fruit trade‐offs, exploratory trade‐offs, and resource‐ and time‐intensive trade‐offs) that such firms make between different dimensions of sustainability. Third, we extend the literature on sustainability implementation (Akhtar et al, 2018; Goworek et al, 2018; Julkovski et al, 2022; O'Reilly et al, 2018; Schönwälder & Weber, 2022) by demonstrating a relationship between different types of trade‐offs and the maturity of sustainability practices in sustainability‐rooted firms. In doing so, we argue that there exists a specific sequence of different trade‐offs concerning different stages of sustainability implementation (i.e., maturity) and impact.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Second, contributing to the literature on the multidimensional nature of trade‐offs in sustainability‐rooted firms (DiVito & Bohnsack, 2017), we identify three typologies of trade‐offs (i.e., low‐hanging fruit trade‐offs, exploratory trade‐offs, and resource‐ and time‐intensive trade‐offs) that such firms make between different dimensions of sustainability. Third, we extend the literature on sustainability implementation (Akhtar et al, 2018; Goworek et al, 2018; Julkovski et al, 2022; O'Reilly et al, 2018; Schönwälder & Weber, 2022) by demonstrating a relationship between different types of trade‐offs and the maturity of sustainability practices in sustainability‐rooted firms. In doing so, we argue that there exists a specific sequence of different trade‐offs concerning different stages of sustainability implementation (i.e., maturity) and impact.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Given that trade-offs among different dimensions of sustainability are complex decisions that span a longer period of time, research on operational approaches of sustainabilityrooted firms highlights the phase-wise manner in which firms implement sustainability (Shevchenko et al, 2016). In line with the literature focusing on the operational approaches of sustainability-rooted firms, the literature on the maturity of sustainability practices also highlights what they term collaboration-intensive (Akhtar et al, 2018;Goworek et al, 2018) phase-wise approaches (Julkovski et al, 2022;Schönwälder & Weber, 2022) to sustainability implementations.…”
Section: Trade-offs In Sustainability Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the suggestions by Adams (2015) and Meredith (1998), results related to CE practices implemented, DTs adopted, and the relationship between the two were analysed by considering their frequency and reported using graphs and supplemented by illustrative examples. The choice is in line with previous works adopting semi-structured interviews as the research method, and it is an interesting approach to allow grasping a snapshot of the overall results (Fallahi et al, 2022;Julkovski et al, 2022;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%