1983
DOI: 10.1021/ic00163a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular dichroism and magnetic circular dichroism spectra of tetrahedral cobalt(II) complexes of thiophenolate, o-xylene-.alpha.,.alpha.'-dithiolate, and L-cysteine-containing oligopeptides

Abstract: The support of the NSF (Grant No. CHE-79-18217) and NIH RCDA (Grant No. 5 KG4 GM 00227) is gratefully acknowledged. We wish to thank Dr. N. D. Chasteen for providing the program eprpow and for helpful comments concerning its use, Ronald D. Guiles for adapting the program to the CDC computer at San Francisco State and for carrying out the EPR spectra simulations, and Dr. Rollie J. Myers for providing access to the Calcomp plotter at the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average ligand field imposed on the Mn 2+ depends on whether it sits at a surface or core site in the Cd 10 cluster. Evaluation of ligand field parameters for Mn 2+ complexes is complicated by the lack of spin-allowed transitions; however, these parameters are known for Co 2+ in two relevant clusters, (PPh 4 ) 2 [Co­(SPh) 4 ] and (NMe 4 ) 2 [Co 4 (SPh) 10 ], as well as CdS (μ 4 -S 2– ). The ligand-field parameters for Co 2+ in the relevant lattices are given in Table . The ligand field strengths of both monovalent PhS – and μ-PhS – ligands are greater than μ 4 -S 2– .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average ligand field imposed on the Mn 2+ depends on whether it sits at a surface or core site in the Cd 10 cluster. Evaluation of ligand field parameters for Mn 2+ complexes is complicated by the lack of spin-allowed transitions; however, these parameters are known for Co 2+ in two relevant clusters, (PPh 4 ) 2 [Co­(SPh) 4 ] and (NMe 4 ) 2 [Co 4 (SPh) 10 ], as well as CdS (μ 4 -S 2– ). The ligand-field parameters for Co 2+ in the relevant lattices are given in Table . The ligand field strengths of both monovalent PhS – and μ-PhS – ligands are greater than μ 4 -S 2– .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously reported ligand field parameters for Co 2+ in the Co-4 clusters are Dq = −58.8 meV and B = 68.1 meV (|Dq|/B = 0.86), and in the Co-1 cluster are Dq = −50.0 meV and B = 79.7 meV (|Dq|/B = 0.63). 32,47,48 Using eqs 1 and 2, we We also observe a gradual shift in the energy of the visible LMCT transition at ∼2.7 eV toward the analogous LMCT transition in Co-4 (∼2.9 eV) with increasing nominal Co 2+ content (see Supporting Information, Figure S4). These results indicate that Co 2+ is incorporated into the M-4 clusters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The bands between ∼2.6 and 3.8 eV are assigned as LMCT transitions from ligand-based π-orbitals of the PhS b − and PhS t − to the partially filled t 2 orbitals of the Co 2+ ion based on previous assignment of the spectra of Co-1 and Co-4 clusters. 41,47 The structured band centered at ∼1.8 eV shown on an expanded energy axis in Figure 1 is the 4 A 2 (F) → 4 T 1 (P) ligand field transition of the pseudotetrahedral Co 2+ ion. 41 The energy and fine structure of the 4 T 1 (P) transition is similar for both (Zn 1−x Co x )-4 and (Cd 1−x Co x )-4 clusters, but not with respect to either the pure Co-4 or Co-1 clusters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both terminal and μ-SPh – ligands have stronger ligand fields compared to μ 4 -S 2– . Thus, Co 2+ coordinated to μ 3 -S 2– and μ-SPh – ligands within the Cd 10 core should cause this transition to red-shift in comparison to strictly surface SPh – coordination. The band shape of the 4 T 1 (P) transition differs vastly among the coordination environments of Co 2+ in Co 1 , Co 4 , and Co:CdS nanocrystals with increased intensity in the highest energy band observed only in the Co 4 cluster and is attributed to bridging SPh – ligands. ,, The observation of the overall slightly red-shifted 4 T 1 (P) transition for the 10% Co:Cd 10 -SA compared to 10% Co:Cd 10 -R in Figure a suggests that the Co 2+ is coordinated to sulfide ligands in the core, which provide a weaker ligand field than either terminal or bridging thiophenolate ligands. The 4 T 1 (P) absorption for Co:Cd 10 -SA is qualitatively more similar to the Co:CdS transition in terms of band shape than Co:Cd 10 -R.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic absorption spectroscopy was used as a dopant-specific probe of the Co 2+ speciation within the Cd 10 clusters as the Co 2+ -centered excited states have been shown previously to be very sensitive to the unique ligand field environments imposed by core versus surface sites. Figure a displays the electronic absorption spectra of the Co:Cd 10 -SA clusters with increasing dopant concentration. The spectra of all pure and doped Cd 10 clusters are dominated by an intense feature in the UV region that is assigned to the ligand-to-metal charge transfer of the host cluster and intraligand π → π* of the thiophenolate ligands .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%