2021
DOI: 10.36253/aestim-10119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular economy and cultural heritage conservation: a proposal for integrating Level(s) evaluation tool

Abstract: The paradigm shift towards a more humanistic and ecological paradigm evoked by United Nations and the Green Deal is increasingly required in this period of growing unsustainability, especially during ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The challenge today is to reduce poverty and inequalities, while preserving the vitality of natural ecosystems and ensuring inclusive economic growth and wellbeing, both now and in the future, thus including future generations. To this end, new models for city development and new tools f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They propose adapting the Level(s) indicators introduced by the European Commission [62] to assess the impacts of cultural heritage reuse within a circular economy framework. Additionally, they suggested enhancing the Level(s) tool by integrating ecological, economic, and technological dimensions with the social and cultural ones [6,61]. This study highlights that the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) emerges as one of the most commonly employed evaluation tools, capable of assessing diverse impacts, including CO 2 and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, throughout the entire lifespan of a product [6].…”
Section: Evaluation Tools For Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reusementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They propose adapting the Level(s) indicators introduced by the European Commission [62] to assess the impacts of cultural heritage reuse within a circular economy framework. Additionally, they suggested enhancing the Level(s) tool by integrating ecological, economic, and technological dimensions with the social and cultural ones [6,61]. This study highlights that the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) emerges as one of the most commonly employed evaluation tools, capable of assessing diverse impacts, including CO 2 and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, throughout the entire lifespan of a product [6].…”
Section: Evaluation Tools For Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reusementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nocca et al (2021) [61] develop a set of indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of cultural heritage adaptive reuse projects, emphasizing the contribution to human wellbeing. They propose adapting the Level(s) indicators introduced by the European Commission [62] to assess the impacts of cultural heritage reuse within a circular economy framework.…”
Section: Evaluation Tools For Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of the income approach are mainly applied for predicting a situation and modeling future decisions. The income approach has been used by the scientists [73][74][75][76] as an element of applied methodologies.…”
Section: Methods Applied In the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If unaltered and functioning, they represent a concrete and visible demonstration of the resilience of past heritage buildings and offer opportunities for the integration of their basic principles in current practices, above all if they are low cost, as is often the case, and can be made available and transferred to different contexts delivering precious solutions to diffused problems. Current studies range from the search for ancient techniques for respectful application to heritage works, to the borrowing of past solutions from heritage assets for new applications in disadvantaged contexts [51][52][53][54], also leading to revisit evaluation criteria for the built heritage [55].…”
Section: Cross-cutting Strategic Potential Of the Built Cultural Heri...mentioning
confidence: 99%