Circular Makerspaces: the founder’s view

Prendeville, Sharon; Hartung, Grit; Brass, Clare; Purvis, Erica; Hall, Ashley

doi:10.1080/19397038.2017.1317876

Cited by 32 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Laukkanen and Patala, 2014;Partidário et al, 2007;Ely et al, 2013). On the other hand, only five articles viewed the civil society as an independent actor of governance strategies within the network-centric view (Monaghan, 2009;Partidário et al, 2007;Prendeville et al, 2017;Seyfang and Longhurst, 2016;Smith et al, 2016). This finding confirms the idea that the involvement of the civil society as an independent actor for sustainable innovation is somewhat overlooked, whereas there is a general consensus for more coordination among different types of actors (Hargreaves et al, 2013;Seyfang and Smith, 2007).…”

Section: Who Governs?supporting

confidence: 51%

“…Total = 10 articles (Arnold, 2017;Ayuso et al, 2006Ayuso et al, , 2011Berkowitz, 2018;Dewberry and Sherwin, 2002;Dossa and Kaeufer, 2014;Flores et al, 2009;Gasbarro et al, 2018;Kennedy et al, 2017;Klewitz, 2017;Leising et al, 2018;Matos and Hall, 2007;Przychodzen et al, 2016;Rossignoli and Lionzo, 2018;Szekely and Strebel, 2013;Wagner, 2011). Total = 16 articles (Ceschin, 2014;Ely et al, 2013;Evans et al, 2007;Halbe et al, 2015;Laukkanen and Patala, 2014;Leach et al, 2012;Monaghan, 2009;Partidário et al, 2007;Partzsch, 2017;Prendeville et al, 2017;Seyfang and Longhurst, 2016;Steiner, 2008). As for future research in this field, we propose six research areas that seem promising.…”

Section: Total = 5 Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the ‘who-how-what’ framework

Lupova-Henry

Dotti

2019

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights  A systematic literature review on governance for sustainable innovations.  The 'who-how-what' framework is used to deconstruct and organise the field  The move beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy is proposed  The need to shift the focus from the 'who' to 'how' of governance is highlighted  Networks, trust, knowledge and 'common good' as keywords for stakeholder engagement

show abstract

Section: Who Governs?supporting

confidence: 51%

Section: Total = 5 Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the ‘who-how-what’ framework

Lupova-Henry

Dotti

2019

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it is necessary to create a cultural atmosphere that is tolerant of trial and failure in makerspaces [15,25]. Environmental support encouraged by mutual assistance can empower innovation activities [26]. Therefore, this paper puts forward the following assumptions:…”

Section: Endogenous Culture Guarantee Mechanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on Mechanism Materials of Innovation Performance of Makerspaces

Lu¹

2021

converter

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The researches of existing makerspaces mainly focus on external factors (policies, resources, etc.) or internal subjects (operating subjects, makers, etc.), but pay little attention to the sustainability and self-running ability of makerspaces themself. In view of this, through theoretical research, this paper combs four operational mechanisms of makerspaces, including platform service, resource aggregation, network connection and endogenous cultural guarantee, and thesemechanisms are regarded as the key materials for the innovation output of makerspaces.By empirical analysis to verify the impact of each operational mechanism on the innovation performance, we explore feasible designs of mechanism that is conducive to the sustainable innovation of makerspaces. The result shows that autonomy of service selection, formal network connection and fault-tolerant culture have significant positive effects on the innovation performance of makerspaces, but it will change with the development stage of makerspaces.

show abstract

“…Rapid prototyping tools and the Arduino platform have a massive online-based community that is easily mobilized through youtube.com, thingyverse.com, arduino.com, instructables.com, etc. (Prendeville et al ., 2017). Although these tools make the learning process easily accessible, they still require motivation and initiative from the user (Han et al ., 2017).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

User research enabled by makerspaces: bringing functionality to classical experience prototypes

Jensen

Steinert

2020

AIEDAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper sheds light on the new possibilities for user research activities facilitated by access to makerspaces. We present four case studies of user research conducted in two university-based makerspaces as examples of makerspace-driven user research. Further, by comparing the cases to three classical user research activities, namely observation, prototyping, and user journey mapping, we highlight the main aspects of this new context of user research. We find that accessibility to makerspaces enables user researchers to build low-fidelity yet high-functionality prototypes for exploring users’ preferences and motivations in controlled and repeatable ways. These prototypes fall into the category of experience prototypes, but they have greater functionality than the prototypes previously used in this field. Thus, a user researcher can explore a topic more systematically and in a more hypothesis-driven manner. In summary, this study encourages stakeholders in the early stages of product development to consider a makerspace as a resource for user-related requirement elicitation rather than for only specific product iteration.

show abstract

Circular Makerspaces: the founder’s view

Cited by 32 publications

References 38 publications

Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the ‘who-how-what’ framework

Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the ‘who-how-what’ framework

Research on Mechanism Materials of Innovation Performance of Makerspaces

User research enabled by makerspaces: bringing functionality to classical experience prototypes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About