1973
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/162.4.367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circular Polarization by Single Scattering of Unpolarized Light from Loss-Less, Non-Spherical Particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms that may produce circular polarization in comets were considered by Bandermann and Kemp (1973), Dolginov andMytrophanov (1975, 1976), Beskrovnaja et al (1987), Dolginov et al (1995). Summarizing these studies, one can conclude that circular polarization in comets may appear as a result of:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms that may produce circular polarization in comets were considered by Bandermann and Kemp (1973), Dolginov andMytrophanov (1975, 1976), Beskrovnaja et al (1987), Dolginov et al (1995). Summarizing these studies, one can conclude that circular polarization in comets may appear as a result of:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominance of single scattering on small grains contradicts the formation of the circular polarization via repeated scatterings on grains whose size is comparable to the wavelength. Elliptically polarized light can also result from single scattering of unpolarized light on dielectric (with a real index of refraction), nonspherical grains [25]. This problem was considered as a way to explain the elliptic polarization of the zodiacal light (for which the highest degree of circular polarization is 0.86% [26]), where the multiple-scattering mechanism is also ruled out due to the low concentration of the grains.…”
Section: °5 885°5890°5895°mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable b is usually interpreted as ay,.the standard deviation of the elevation angle of the wind, and is rarely larger than 0.5. Results of calculations using (13) and b = 0.1 (shown in Figure 2) do not deviate significantly from the ratios predicted by (14) for all values of 0 k 0.1.…”
Section: Limiting Cases 1 Trajectories Above Source Pointmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For certain values of 8 and b (those for which the value of the error functions in (13) are sufficiently near unity) the centerline concentration reduces to…”
Section: Limiting Cases 1 Trajectories Above Source Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%