2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2017.2676165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circularly Polarized Bandwidth-Enhanced Crossed Dipole Antenna with a Simple Single Parasitic Element

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the information from the table, it is clear that the proposed antenna is more competitive than those in Refs. , because of its wider IBW and ARBW. Compared to the antennas in Refs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By comparing the information from the table, it is clear that the proposed antenna is more competitive than those in Refs. , because of its wider IBW and ARBW. Compared to the antennas in Refs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One bowtieshaped element helps the crossed bowtie dipoles to generate additional resonance. 13 A crossed bowtie dipole loading with parasitic cross-slots and eight parasitic patches in Ref. 14 obtain a broad IBW of 93.1% and a good ARBW of 90.9%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to simplify the feed structure, a single feed CP crossed dipole antenna (0.42 λ 0 × 0.42 λ 0 × 0.25 λ 0 ) is originally presented in Reference , which exhibits the IBW of 30.7% and the 3‐dB ARBW of 15.6%. Next, a crossed dipole is designed with a simple single parasitic element to enhance the IBW of 60.4% and the 3‐dB ARBW of 58.6% in Reference . Furthermore, Reference enhances the IBW to 93.1% and the ARBW to 90.9% by loading a plurality of parasitic elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to redirect a half of the radiation into the opposite direction, the crossed-dipole antennas are generally horizontally placed on a metallic reflector [14]. In addition, the operational bandwidth of conventional crossed dipoles can be broadened by loading parasitic elements [15,16] or by using an enlarged dipole [17,18]. However, the crossed-dipole antennas equipped with a metallic reflector suffers from a large profile, which is approximately λ/4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%