2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating angiotensin type II receptor: Possible marker for antibody mediated rejection after renal transplantation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The early publications suggest that anti‐AT1R antibodies can be associated with AMR and/or might contribute to poorer long‐term outcomes in kidney transplantation . However, Deltombe et al found no increased tendency to acute rejection episodes or long‐term graft outcomes among kidney recipients who were positive for anti‐AT1R prior to transplant, and Kimball reported no increased risk for AMR among presensitized recipients, although sustained elevations of anti‐AT1R were associated with poorer patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early publications suggest that anti‐AT1R antibodies can be associated with AMR and/or might contribute to poorer long‐term outcomes in kidney transplantation . However, Deltombe et al found no increased tendency to acute rejection episodes or long‐term graft outcomes among kidney recipients who were positive for anti‐AT1R prior to transplant, and Kimball reported no increased risk for AMR among presensitized recipients, although sustained elevations of anti‐AT1R were associated with poorer patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dragun et al [8,13] have shown for the first time their involvement in patients presenting acute rejection episodes (ARE) with severe hypertensive crisis. Since this first observation, the correlation of anti-AT1R antibodies and acute rejection and/or graft failure has become more debated in kidney transplantation sometimes due to a lack of power of studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In 2013, we showed on a large monocentric cohort (n = 599) of French kidney recipients that patients who displayed a pretransplant AT1R-Ab level above 10 U/ml had higher risk of acute rejection episodes within the first month following transplantation and graft failure beyond 3 years post-transplantation [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by a prospective study that found the presence of AT1R‐Ab was not associated with elevated donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA), a marker for allograft injury, and did not appear to be associated with risk for rejection (38). Kimball et al also found that pre‐transplant AT1R‐Ab in adult recipients was not associated with increased risk for AMR or allograft failure but was rather associated with poorer outcomes when AT1R‐Ab levels increased during early AMR leading to the speculation that post‐transplant elevations of AT1R‐Ab may be an indicator of ongoing tissue damage (10). In a study by Crespo et al pre‐transplant AT1R‐Ab was frequently found in those with HLA‐DSA positive AMR, but rarely seen in those with HLA‐DSA negative AMR, suggesting pre‐transplant AT1R‐Ab may act synergistically with HLA‐DSA in AMR (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among renal transplant recipients, AT1R‐Ab monitoring is becoming more common as studies have demonstrated adverse allograft outcomes in the presence of pre‐ and/or post‐transplant AT1R‐Ab. (4,7–12,16–18). In this observational study, we showed that pre‐transplant AT1R‐Ab ≥17 U/ml in our small pediatric cohort was not associated with rejection and did not impact graft function or survival, similar to several other studies among adult renal transplant recipients (10,33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%