BLOOD FLOW DISTRIBUTION at rest and during exercise is intricately controlled by centrally driven neuroeffector mechanisms and circulating hormones (particularly epinephrine), local autacoids, and metabolites, all superimposed on the inherent or "myogenic" reactivity of the arterial smooth muscle. During exercise, the cardiac output of a trained athlete can increase ϳ5-fold, and these mechanisms serve to coordinate a huge (ϳ20-fold) increase in the amount of blood routed to the exercising muscle (3). The dramatic nature of this increase is illustrated by the fact that the proportion of the cardiac output diverted to skeletal muscle can change from 20% to ϳ80%! Importantly, and to the benefit of the individual, despite this enormous increase in the flow of blood to muscle, brain blood flow is not compromised (3). But to what extent do the inherent characteristics of the arteries of the brain and musculature explain these distinct changes?As cerebral arteries are not particularly responsive to the sympathetic nerves surrounding them, myogenic reactivity is thought to be a fundamental determinant of the constant flow of blood to the brain and, as a consequence, has been extensively studied. The most direct studies have assessed how changes in intraluminal pressure links to smooth muscle contraction/relaxation in isolated arteries, where reflex and most local influences are absent and steady-state conditions can be achieved. It is technically extremely difficult to make intracellular recordings from the very small (Ͻ10 m width) smooth muscle cells, particularly in isolated arteries under physiological pressure. However, a now classic study in 1984 by Harder (13) first showed that increasing pressure alone caused depolarization and as a result stimulated Ca 2ϩ influx and vasoconstriction. Unfortunately, technology at the time did not allow accurate simultaneous measurement of diameter. This was achieved in later studies, notably from Nelson's group (19), as the complexity of the myogenic control mechanism became apparent. It is now known that voltage-activated calcium entry is not the only mechanism responsible for changes in myogenic tone (16) and that the relative contributions from different mechanisms vary between and within vascular beds.In this issue of the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Kotecha and Hill (21) are the latest to attempt the extremely difficult task of quantifying the importance of membrane potential for myogenic reactivity, but this time in a resistance artery from a striated muscle bed (the rat cremaster muscle, pressurized arteries with a passive diameter of ϳ140 m at 70 mmHg). This is the first study in a muscle resistance artery that has attempted to assess the effect of a stepwise increase in luminal pressure on smooth muscle membrane potential and arterial diameter. In addition, the authors have compared their data with published data from rat isolated cerebral arteries [distal posterior, passive diameter of ϳ200 m at 70 mmHg (19)] to attempt to reveal how...