An accurate biomarker for detection of ovarian cancer may reduce cancer-related mortality. Using a previously developed microarray-based technique, we evaluated differences in DNA methylation profiles in a panel of 56 genes using sections of serous papillary adenocarcinomas and uninvolved ovaries (n ؍ 30) from women in a high-risk group. Methylation profiles were also generated for circulating DNA from blood of patients (n ؍ 33) and healthy controls (n ؍ 33). Using the most differentially methylated genes for naïve Bayesian analysis, we identified ten of these profiles as potentially informative in tissues. Various combinations of these genes produced 69% sensitivity and 70% specificity for cancer detection as estimated under a stratified , fivefold cross-validation protocol. In plasma , five genes were identified as informative; their combination had 85% sensitivity and 61% specificity for cancer detection. These results suggest that differential methylation profiling in heterogeneous samples has the potential to identify components of a composite biomarker that may detect ovarian cancer in blood with significant accuracy. Despite its relatively low prevalence, 1 ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological malignancies. At early stages, women are mostly asymptomatic or present with vague and non-specific symptoms, so early ovarian cancer is difficult to diagnose. Considering that patients diagnosed with stage I ovarian cancer have a 5-year survival rate over 90%, early detection of ovarian cancer may reduce cancer-related mortality.It has been suggested that a screening test for ovarian cancer should have a positive predictive value of 10% or more; such that 10 women would undergo exploratory surgery to diagnose one cancer.2 The low prevalence of ovarian cancer requires that a screening test has a sensitivity of at least 75% and a specificity of at least 99.6%.
2The screening test should also be simple, inexpensive, and produce only minimal discomfort for the patient. Such a test has yet to emerge.The most widely used procedure for ovarian cancer detection and monitoring is a blood-based test for cancer antigen 125 (CA125).3,4 Its specificity for early-stage disease is high (96% to 100%), but the sensitivity is low, 5 so the test must be combined with other diagnostic techniques. A two-line screening procedure has been suggested in which candidates with high CA125 undergo follow-up transvaginal ultrasonography. 6 Unfortunately, this combination still has only a limited sensitivity because of the low sensitivity of the initial CA125 test.7 Even when high-risk women are screened, the test does not provide considerable advantages 8 ; it does not detect tumors early enough to influence outcomes.9 As a result, low sensitivity and a high rate of false-negative results of the CA125 test reduce access to transvaginal ultrasonography; on the other hand, the low sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasonography for early cancer suggests that the effect on prognosis would be negligible.
9To impro...