2010
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitors as predictive markers of clinical response to bevacizumab-based first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients

Abstract: Our study suggests significant correlations between both tCEC and rCEC baseline levels and the antitumor efficacy of a bevacizumab-based combination therapy in mCRC patients, thus confirming that these biomarkers could be used in the clinical setting as an early predictor of tumor response.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this present study, hypertension was well managed by antihypertensive agents and proteinuria was managed by dose reductions or delays, and did not cause dose interruptions at the MTD or lower doses. The subpopulations of CEC and CEP may be predictive of disease or clinical responsiveness to anti-VEGF agents to a greater extent (26). E7080 has previously been shown to decrease the number of total CEC in tumor-bearing mice (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this present study, hypertension was well managed by antihypertensive agents and proteinuria was managed by dose reductions or delays, and did not cause dose interruptions at the MTD or lower doses. The subpopulations of CEC and CEP may be predictive of disease or clinical responsiveness to anti-VEGF agents to a greater extent (26). E7080 has previously been shown to decrease the number of total CEC in tumor-bearing mice (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of surrogate biomarkers able to define their optimal biological dosage (OBD), and/or to predict the clinical benefit in a given patient, and/or to predict patient's escape from the therapy is hampering their clinical development. 18 We and others [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] have recently reported that the measurement of CECs and CEPs in cancer patients receiving antiangiogenic drugs is a surrogate biomarker that has clinical predictive potential for patients' selection and follow-up. Using a flow cytometry approach similar to what we have developed and validated for CEC and CEP count, 13 we report here a protocol for PPC enumeration in the preclinical and clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CECs are rare events, their precise quantification in peripheral blood (PB) samples requires a technically rigorous analytical approach, which should take many factors into consideration (8). Several pre-analytical and analytical steps significantly affect not only the quantification of CECs, but can also result in a change in the definition of these cells, leading to problems in the interpretation of the results (Table I) and in their potential association with clinical endpoints (Table II) (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34).…”
Section: Flow Cytometric Analysis Of Circulating Endothelial Cells Inmentioning
confidence: 99%