2020
DOI: 10.1159/000515409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating Serum Magnesium and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Men: A Long-Term Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: <b><i>Background and Objective:</i></b> Serum magnesium, an essential trace element involved in processes that regulate cardiovascular function, has been linked to the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the potential association between serum magnesium and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been previously investigated. We aimed to assess the prospective association of serum magnesium with the risk of VTE. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Serum magn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between serum magnesium level and thrombosis was demonstrated in a study including a middle-aged male population, where serum magnesium level was not associated with future risk of venous thromboembolism. 28 In our study, there was no statistical difference between baseline, mean, and peak magnesium levels of DVT (+) and (-) cases. There was no difference in thrombosis in the magnesium infusion group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The relationship between serum magnesium level and thrombosis was demonstrated in a study including a middle-aged male population, where serum magnesium level was not associated with future risk of venous thromboembolism. 28 In our study, there was no statistical difference between baseline, mean, and peak magnesium levels of DVT (+) and (-) cases. There was no difference in thrombosis in the magnesium infusion group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The adjustment for confounders were based on three models: (model 1) age and total energy intake; (model 2) model 1 plus systolic blood pressure, BMI, serum TAG, smoking status, alcohol consumption, leisure-time physical activity, socio-economic status, total energy intake, serum albumin, intake of fruits, berries and vegetables, intake of processed and unprocessed red meat, and history of cancer; and (model 3) a potential mediator-adjusted model comprising history of type 2 diabetes, serum total cholesterol, serum TAG and serum highsensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. The confounders selected for models 1-2 were based on their previously established roles as risk factors for VTE, evidence from previous research, previously published associations with VTE in the KIHD study (39)(40)(41) , or their potential as confounders based on known associations with VTE outcomes and observed associations with egg consumption using the available data (42) . Tests of interaction were used to formally assess if the risk of VTE…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjustment for confounders were based on four models: (Model 1) age; (Model 2) Model 1 plus systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, triglycerides, smoking status, history of type 2 diabetes (T2D), history of coronary heart disease (CHD), medication for dyslipidaemia, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and socioeconomic status (SES); (Model 3) Model 2 plus high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and history of cancer; and (Model 4) a model comprising dietary factors including serum magnesium, total energy intake, intake of processed and unprocessed red meat, and intake of fruits, berries and vegetables. The confounders selected were based on their previously established roles as risk factors for VTE, evidence from previous research, previously published associations with VTE in the KIHD study (Kunutsor et al 2021 , 2019a ; Kunutsor and Laukkanen 2021 ), or their potential as confounders based on known associations with VTE outcomes and observed associations with serum zinc using the available data (Groenwold et al 2011 ). Given the long-follow-up of the cohort, we explored the potential for regression dilution bias by conducting sensitivity analysis that was restricted to the first 10 years of follow-up.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%