2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulation of Geldart D type particles: Part I – High solids fluxes. Measurements and computation under solids slugging conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of axial solid holdups and particle velocity profiles along the bed height direction between Case 1 and Case 2 are presented in Figure 7. The results indicate that near the inlet region of the FBR, the difference is not appreciable except that oscillation created due to the inlet effect of particles [59]. In the middle-upper part of the bed vertical section, Case 2 shows a higher solid volume fraction with obvious fluctuations, and it can be observed in Figure 5b.…”
Section: Solid Volume Fractionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparisons of axial solid holdups and particle velocity profiles along the bed height direction between Case 1 and Case 2 are presented in Figure 7. The results indicate that near the inlet region of the FBR, the difference is not appreciable except that oscillation created due to the inlet effect of particles [59]. In the middle-upper part of the bed vertical section, Case 2 shows a higher solid volume fraction with obvious fluctuations, and it can be observed in Figure 5b.…”
Section: Solid Volume Fractionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The changes of core-annulus particle flow regime cause the axial pressure gradient to be less than the weight of PE particles in the core region, while the axial pressure drop is greater than the weight of the particles in the annular area. The particle velocity is inversely related to the solids volume fraction as shown in [59]. From the comparisons of solid holdups in Figure 6b, Case 2 will lead to lower particle velocities, as shown in Figure 8b.…”
Section: Solid Volume Fractionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The solids slugging can cause significant fluctuation in solid fluidization and is not recommended for normal operation of fluidized-bed reactors; however, as indicated by Kashyap et al [30], solids slugging can provide some advantages such as avoiding solids back-mixing in the near-wall region and gas bypassing the central core region. The solids slugging structure can be measured with the technology of gamma ray densitometry [30,31]. Other techniques such as particle image velocimetry (PIV), laser doppler anemometry (LDA), and fiber optic probe can also be used for the measurement of solids structure in fluidized-bed reactors [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Cfd Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solids slugging structure can be measured with the technology of gamma ray densitometry [30,31]. Other techniques such as particle image velocimetry (PIV), laser doppler anemometry (LDA), and fiber optic probe can also be used for the measurement of solids structure in fluidized-bed reactors [31][32][33][34]. In this work the measurement of solids concentration was not done due to lack of these advanced measuring instruments; however, the measurement of solids concentration will be included in our future studies to improve the quality of our research.…”
Section: Cfd Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eulerian-Granular two-fluid model (TFM) has been employed in the simulations of the gas-solid hydrodynamics of fluidized beds with Group "B" and "D" particles [1,2]. However, the application of the TFM for Group "A" particles was barely successful unless very fine grid sizes and very small time steps were used in the computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%