Circum‐Arctic distribution of chemical anti‐herbivore compounds suggests biome‐wide trade‐off in defence strategies in Arctic shrubs

Abstract

Spatial variation in plant chemical defence towards herbivores can help us understand variation in herbivore top-down control of shrubs in the Arctic and possibly also shrub responses to global warming. Less defended, non-resinous shrubs could be more influenced by herbivores than more defended, resinous shrubs. However, sparse field measurements limit our current understanding of how much of the circum-Arctic variation in defence compounds is explained by taxa or defence functional groups (resinous/non-resinous). We measured circum-Arctic chemical defence and leaf digestibility in resinous (Betula glandulosa, B. nana ssp. exilis) and non-resinous (B. nana ssp. nana, B. pumila) shrub birches to see how they vary among and within taxa and functional groups. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomic analyses and in vitro leaf digestibility via incubation in cattle rumen fluid, we analysed defence composition and leaf digestibility in 128 samples from 44 tundra locations.We found biogeographical patterns in anti-herbivore defence where mean leaf triterpene concentrations and twig resin gland density were greater in resinous taxa and mean concentrations of condensing tannins were greater in non-resinous taxa. This indicates a biome-wide trade-off between triterpene-or tannin-dominated defences. However, we also found variations in chemical defence composition and resin gland density both within and among functional groups (resinous/non-resinous) and taxa, suggesting these categorisations only partly predict chemical herbivore defence. Complex tannins were the only defence compounds negatively related to in vitro digestibility, identifying this previously neglected tannin group as having a potential key role in birch anti-herbivore defence.We conclude that circum-Arctic variation in birch anti-herbivore defence can be partly derived from biogeographical distributions of birch taxa, although our detailed mapping of plant defence provides more information on this variation and can be used for better predictions of herbivore effects on Arctic vegetation.

Volatile responses of dwarf birch to mimicked insect herbivory and experimental warming at two elevations in Greenlandic tundra

“…The vegetation at both sites was dominated by grayleaf willow ( Salix glauca L.) and dwarf birch ( Betula glandulosa Michx.) (Lindén et al, 2022 ).…”

Assessing contemporary Arctic habitat availability for a woolly mammoth proxy

“…Studies on arctic herbivore digestibility report factors of approximately ~ 0.8 for forbs, ~ 0.5 for graminoids (grasses, sedges, and rushes), and ~ 0.6 for deciduous shrubs 94 , 96 , 115 , 116 . Shrubs were downgraded by a further 50% to adjust for likely proboscidean dietary preferences and to avoid biasing the overall availability toward the more abundant shrub biomass (approximately 50% of plant biomass in the area).…”

Wilder rangelands as a natural climate opportunity: Linking climate action to biodiversity conservation and social transformation

“…Herbivory plays a critical role in shaping the structure and composition of vegetation in diverse landscapes with additional benefits for biodiversity, CC mitigation and adaptation. For example, reindeer, moose ( Alces alces ), and other large and small herbivores in the Arctic tundra increase plant species richness by suppressing dominant species (Lindén et al 2021 ) and reduce woody cover, resulting in increased surface albedo and a reduction in solar energy absorption at the surface (te Beest et al 2016 ), potentially leading to local atmospheric cooling. Wild animals also influence ecosystem resilience through dispersal of seeds and nutrients.…”