“…Thus, Co II complexes combining strong axial and weak equatorial bonds (axially compressed octahedral geometry), as it occurs in [Co(tu) 4 Cl 2 ], stabilize a large axial anisotropy, whereas the combination of large axial bonds and short equatorial bonds, like in [Co(py) 4 Cl 2 ], favors large positive D values. 18,19 This qualitative magneto-structural correlation seems not to be of general applicability, because compressed octahedral CoN 6 complexes, such as [Co(py) 4 (NCS) 2 ] 19 and [Co(pto) 4 (NCS) 2 ] (pto = 2-(pyridine-2-yl)-5-thiophen-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole, 20 have a similar ratio between the axial and equatorial bond distances, however, they exhibit D values of opposite sign. Therefore, in order to clarify this appar-ent contradiction more examples of this type of complexes, like 5, where the sign of D is unambiguously supported by a combination of theoretical and experimental methods, such as HFEPR, PND and single-crystal torque anisotropy, are needed.…”