Academic and Professional Publishing 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-84334-669-2.50010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citation, bibliometrics and quality: assessing impact and usage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been reported to the bibliometric analysis for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (López-Muñoz et al, 2008) and Anti-psychotic drugs (López-Muñoz et al, 2018). The most commonly used parameter for research impact assessment is the citations or average citations per paper counts (Aksnes et al, 2019;Finch, 2012;Simko, 2015). The average number of citations per paper (ACPP) was observed between 2.50 to 40.30 citations from 1951 to 2020, with a peak of 40.30 in 2005 with an overall mean of 18.18 citations per paper.…”
Section: Research Productivitysupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results have been reported to the bibliometric analysis for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (López-Muñoz et al, 2008) and Anti-psychotic drugs (López-Muñoz et al, 2018). The most commonly used parameter for research impact assessment is the citations or average citations per paper counts (Aksnes et al, 2019;Finch, 2012;Simko, 2015). The average number of citations per paper (ACPP) was observed between 2.50 to 40.30 citations from 1951 to 2020, with a peak of 40.30 in 2005 with an overall mean of 18.18 citations per paper.…”
Section: Research Productivitysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The publication growth of Mucormycosis research witnessed an exponentially from 10 publications in 1951 to 1245 publications in 2020, with slight fluctuations in 1971, 1979 and 2015. The exponential growth indicates that Mucormycosis research is taking place increasingly globally:The most commonly used parameter for research impact assessment is the citations or average citations per paper counts(Aksnes et al, 2019;Finch, 2012;Simko, 2015). The average number of citations per paper (ACPP) was observed between 2.50 to 40.30 citations from 1951 to 2020, with a peak of 40.30 in 2005 with an overall mean of 18.18 citations per paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, as recently shown by Syrimi [26]. Performance indicators measured by the number of received citations are used to identify the quality of the scientific publication and gauge its impact on the scientific community [31]. In our study, retrieved documents received a total of 316,017 citations with an average citation per document of 28.35 ± 7.7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Performance indicators measured by the number of received citations are used to identify the quality of the scientific publication and gauge its impact on the scientific community. (31) In our study, retrieved documents received a total of 316,017 citations with an average citation per document of 28.35 ± 7.7. This was higher than for other rare oncological diseases, such as male breast cancer with a total number of 76,104 citations (32), but lower compared to more prevalent cancers, such as female breast cancer (n=4,136,224 citations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%