Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis

Chhapola, Viswas; Tiwari, Soumya; Deepthi, Bobbity; Kanwal, Sandeep Kumar

doi:10.1007/s12519-018-0146-6

Cited by 20 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…54,55 The number of citations generally parallels the quality of the research. A citation analysis equates well with other indices of scientific acknowledgement by the professional community, 56 which is the more important part of publishing, 31 and is therefore frequently used to evaluate a scientific publication, an author, a given topic, a disease, a specialty, or a country. 57 A bibliometric index can help researchers search for quality scientific information 58 and help clinicians to execute daily practice.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A bibliometric analysis of Periodontology 2000

Ahmad

Asif

Alam

et al. 2019

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The continually high impact factor of Periodontology 2000 (7.861 for 2018), the level of which is unprecedented among dental journals, prompted the present bibliometric analysis of the Journal. Since the inception of Periodontology 2000 in 1993 and until July 2019, the top 100 most‐cited articles have received a total of 21,276 (Web of Science), 23,009 (Elsevier's Scopus), and 43,518 (Google Scholar) citations. The citations of the 100 most‐cited articles were found to vary from 118 to 827 (Web of Science), 10 to 1069 (Scopus), and 15 to 2028 (Google Scholar). Three articles had more than 600 (Web of Science) citations, 5 had between 400 and 600 citations, 25 had between 200 and 400 citations, and 67 had between 100 and 200 citations. The first authors of the 100 most‐cited articles were based in the USA (51%), Switzerland (14%), and Australia (10%). The 5 dental institutions with the most frequently cited articles were The Forsyth Institute, USA (9 articles), The University of Queensland, Australia (8 articles), University of Bern, Switzerland (7), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA (6 articles), and University of Washington, USA, and Temple University School of Dentistry, USA (5 articles each). The likely reason for the high impact factor of Periodontology 2000 is publication of insightful and timely review articles produced by eminent researchers and clinicians from a wide range of dental institutions and countries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bibliometric studies have been conducted on the most influential scientific articles in the fields of medicine and dentistry . However, no study has been performed on the top 100 most‐cited (“classic”) articles published in a dental journal.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of Periodontology 2000

Ahmad

Asif

Alam

et al. 2019

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[10][11][12][13] Citation analyses have been performed in a variety of specialties within medicine such as neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, pediatrics, radiology, psychiatry, and oncology. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Within orthopaedics, citation analyses are available on topics including unicondylar knee arthroplasty, elbow surgery, total ankle arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, knee surgery, and recently, shoulder arthroscopy. [27][28][29][30][31] The purpose of this article is to objectively identify the 50 most influential studies in knee arthroscopy and provide an analysis of their key characteristics.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Top 50 Most-Cited Knee Arthroscopy Studies

Murphy

Moore

Pollock

et al. 2021

Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To objectively identify the 50 most influential studies in knee arthroscopy and provide an analysis of their key characteristics. Methods: The Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge database was used to gather data and metrics of knee arthroscopy research. The search list was sorted by the number of citations, and articles were included or excluded based on relevance to knee arthroscopy. The information extracted for each article included author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type, and the level of evidence. Results: For these 50 studies, the total number of citations was calculated to be 12,168, with an average of 243.4 citations per paper. The most-cited article was cited 1,220 times. The 50 studies included in this analysis were published between 1972 and 2013. All 50 articles were published in English and came from 10 different orthopaedic journals. The United States was responsible for the majority of articles (n ¼ 26); however, many other countries were represented. The most prevalent study designs were case series (n ¼ 20). Conclusions: The 50 most influential articles in knee arthroscopy were cited a total of 12,168 times. The study designs most commonly used were case series and cohort studies. This article serves as a reference to direct orthopaedic practitioners to the 50 most influential studies in knee arthroscopy. We hope that these 50 studies and the analysis we provide help health care professionals efficiently assess consensus, trends, and needs within the field. Clinical Relevance: This analysis of the 50 most influential studies in knee arthroscopy will provide medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians with a comprehensive inventory and citation analysis of the most impactful academic contributions to one of the most important fields within orthopaedic surgery.A rthroscopic surgery has undoubtedly broadened the field of orthopaedic surgery and significantly improved patient outcomes. 1,2 Arthroscopic procedures are minimally invasive alternatives to open surgery, and, as such, have been associated with decreased recovery times and infection rates. 3,4 In addition, arthroscopy can be performed on almost any joint, with the knee being the most common. 2 In 1912, Severin Nordentoft, became the first physician to visualize the internal structures of a knee joint via endoscope. 5 By 1920, both Kenju Takagi, and Eugen

show abstract

“…Assessment quality and quantity of literature has become much more important in the scientific area, and bibliometrics analysis is the most important involved method [ 12 – 14 ]. Fixing citation thresholds (100-400 citations) and choosing the top-cited studies (top 25 to 100) from a list [ 15 ] were the most common bibliometrics analysis method. Up to now, there have been several top-cited studies on various clinical specialties, including anesthesiology [ 16 ], tuberculosis [ 17 ], orthopedic surgery [ 18 ], gastric cancer [ 19 ], and gastroenterology [ 20 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 100 Top-Cited Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses on Diabetic Research

Yang

Chen

et al. 2020

Journal of Diabetes Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. The objective of this study was to analyze the 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses on diabetic research. Methods. The Science Citation Index Expanded database was searched to identify top-cited studies on diabetic research up to March 4th, 2020. Studies were analyzed using the following characteristics: citation number, publication year, country and institution of origin, authorship, topics, and journals. Results. The 100 top-cited diabetic systematic reviews/meta-analyses were published in 43 different journals, with Diabetes Care having the highest numbers (n=17), followed by The Journal of the American Medical Association (n=14) and Lancet (n=9). The majority of studies are published in the 2000s. The number of citations ranged from 2197 to 301. The highest number of contributions was from the USA, followed by England and Australia. The leading institution was Harvard University. The hot topic was a risk factor (n=33), followed by comorbidity (n=27). Conclusions. The 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses on diabetic research identify impactful authors, journals, institutes, and countries. It will also provide the most important references to evidence-based medicine in diabetes and serve as a guide to the features of a citable paper in this field.

show abstract

Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract: The top-100 cited articles in pediatrics identify the impactful authors, journals, institutes, and countries. Observational study design was predominant-implying that inclusion among citation classics is not related to soundness of study design.

Cited by 20 publications

References 35 publications

A bibliometric analysis of Periodontology 2000

A bibliometric analysis of Periodontology 2000

The Top 50 Most-Cited Knee Arthroscopy Studies

The 100 Top-Cited Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses on Diabetic Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About