2018
DOI: 10.5735/085.055.0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citation Metrics and Impact Factors Fail as Measures of Scientific Quality, in Particular in Taxonomy, and are Biased by Biological Discipline and by Geographic and Taxonomic Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that include analyses of large datasets (Fox et al 2016), or international or multi‐disciplinary collaborations are also cited more often (Leimu and Koricheva 2005 a , b ). In addition, study species (Rosenthal et al 2017), study location, and the type of article (e.g., focal system) can influence citation frequency (Tyler 2018). In a study investigating taxonomic citation bias, for example, chordate studies received more citations than arthropod studies (Rosenthal et al 2017).…”
Section: Hypothesis Description Associated Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that include analyses of large datasets (Fox et al 2016), or international or multi‐disciplinary collaborations are also cited more often (Leimu and Koricheva 2005 a , b ). In addition, study species (Rosenthal et al 2017), study location, and the type of article (e.g., focal system) can influence citation frequency (Tyler 2018). In a study investigating taxonomic citation bias, for example, chordate studies received more citations than arthropod studies (Rosenthal et al 2017).…”
Section: Hypothesis Description Associated Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the age of the UK Research Excellence Framework, and the focus on ‘impact' as a measure of scientific quality, there is the potential for significant barriers to progression for university‐based ecologists, especially as ecological research is typically long‐term in comparison to other STEM disciplines; for example, at least a decade of consistent monitoring is needed to capture statistically significant trends in vertebrate populations (White 2018) and a resulting impact case would take even longer to develop. Exercises such as the Research Excellence Framework are highly metric‐driven, yet for ecology and its sub‐disciplines metrics can be poor predictors of scientific quality (Tyler 2018). There is a risk that metric‐induced barriers to progression will be further compounded by the UK Teaching Excellence Framework (Whalley 2019) given the additional burden on teachers, and the potential conflict between teaching and research (Perkins 2019).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scientific citation analysis keeps drawing attention from the science community [1,2,3], much less (if not zero) is paid to simplifying the production of in-text citation itself in the preparation of a scientific manuscript. As geneticist Yaniv Erlich (for whom the pain of managing references is real) tweeted, "We are far closer to a level 5 autonomous vehicle and space tourism than a functional citation manager.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%