Citation Network Analysis of the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Martínez-Pérez, Clara; Álvarez-Peregrina, Cristina; Villa-Collar, César; Sánchez-Tena, Miguel Ángel

doi:10.3390/ijerph17207690

Cited by 34 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 70 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Top authors with the largest publications on COVID-19 were Wang Y. (0.55%), Mahase E (0.47%) and Li Y (0.43%) [10]. In our study, Dhama K. had the highest number of publications (n=23, 0.83%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 48%

“…The most productive countries in our study were the USA, China, India, England and Italy. It was previously reported that USA, China and Italy were the countries with the highest publication rates [10]. In a study, according to publications in relation to confirmed COVID-19 cases correlated deaths and total population size, the USA were leading with the highest number of both COVID-19 cases as well as related publications [9].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…According to our results proportion of original articles was 49.59% followed by reviews (32.51%) and editorial materials (12.12%). In a previous study on COVID-19, 39.90% were articles and 26.42% were editorial material [10]. Researchers preferred original articles as a method for following developments in vaccines instead of opinions and editorials.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A scientometric analysis of COVID-19 vaccine publications

Ay¹,

Erenler²,

Ay³

et al. 2021

World J. Adv. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 that was declared as a pandemic has been the main subject of research all over the world. Especially studies on COVID-19 vaccines has become a hope for everyone. In this study, we aimed to analyse entire literature through Web of Science© Core Collection Database and reveal the current status of COVID-19 vaccine literature. We entered the keywords “COVID-19” and “vaccine” to Web of Science© Core Collection Database on January 20, 2021. Web of Science categories, document types, organizations, funding agencies, authors, journals, countries, languages, study fields, were investigated. A total of 2,765 publications with 24,202 citations times were involved into the study. Majority of the publications were original articles. Immunology, General Internal Medicine and Experimental Medicine Research were the top categories. Top productive Universities were Harvard University, University of California System and University of London. Dhama K. had the highest number of publications followed by Mahase E. and Baric RS. Journal of Biomolecular Structure Dynamics had published the highest number of publications. Majority of the publications were written in English. The United States of America was the most productive country followed by China and India. Research in vaccines is a growing field and is an essential component in the fight against COVID-19. Detailed analyses on vaccine publications may help researchers determine the future perspective.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 48%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A scientometric analysis of COVID-19 vaccine publications

Ay¹,

Erenler²,

Ay³

et al. 2021

World J. Adv. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These programs offer a much more detailed analysis when creating citation networks compared to other databases such as Web of Science or Scopus [ 13 ]. In addition, for the methodology, we based ours on other studies of citation networks carried out by our research team [ 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric and Citation Network Analysis of Myopia Genetics

Álvarez-Peregrina

Martínez-Pérez

Villa-Collar

et al. 2021

Genes

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To aim of the study was describe the growth of publications on genetic myopia and understand the current research landscape through the analysis of citation networks, as well as determining the different research areas and the most cited publications. Methods: The Web of Science database was used to perform the publication search, looking for the terms “genetic*” AND “myopia” within the period between 2009 and October 2020. The CitNetExplorer and CiteSpace software were then used to conduct the publication analysis. To obtain the graphics, the VOSviewer software was used. Results: A total of 721 publications were found with 2999 citations generated within the network. The year 2019 was singled out as a “key year”, taking into account the number of publications that emerged in that year and given that in 2019, 200 loci associated with refractive errors and myopia were found, which is considered to be great progress. The most widely cited publication was “Genome-wide meta-analyses of multiancestry cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia”, an article by Verhoeven et al., which was published in 2013. By using the clustering function, we were able to establish three groups that encompassed the different research areas within this field: heritability rate of myopia and its possible association with environmental factors, retinal syndromes associated with myopia and the genetic factors that control and influence axial growth of the eye. Conclusions: The citation network offers a comprehensive and objective analysis of the main papers that address genetic myopia.

show abstract

“…Therefore, these functions make it possible for a complete analysis and study of the research on the field of study to be conducted. The methodology was based on other citation network studies carried out by our research team [ 49 , 50 , 51 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of COVID-19 at the Ocular Level: A Citation Network Study

Sánchez-Tena

Martínez-Pérez

Villa-Collar

et al. 2021

JCM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The main objective of this study was to use citation networks to analyze the relationship between different publications on the impact of COVID-19 at an ocular level and their authors. Furthermore, the different research areas will be identified, and the most cited publication will be determined. Materials and Methods: The publications were searched within the Web of Science database, using “ocular”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “ophthalmology”, “eyesight”, and “COVID-19” as keywords for the period between January 2020 and January 2021. The Citation Network Explorer and the CiteSpace software were used to analyze the different publications. Results: A total of 389 publications with 890 citations generated on the web were found. It must be highlighted that July was the month with the largest number of publications. The most cited ones were “Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China” by Wu et al., which was published in May 2020. Three groups covering the different research areas in this field were found using the clustering functions: ocular manifestations, teleophthalmology, and personal protective equipment. Conclusions: The citation network has shown a comprehensive and objective analysis of the main studies on the impact of COVID-19 in ocular disease.

show abstract

Citation Network Analysis of the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Cited by 34 publications

References 70 publications

A scientometric analysis of COVID-19 vaccine publications

A scientometric analysis of COVID-19 vaccine publications

A Bibliometric and Citation Network Analysis of Myopia Genetics

Impact of COVID-19 at the Ocular Level: A Citation Network Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About