2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3306272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond

Abstract: In this paper we comparatively explore three claims concerning the disciplinary character of economics by means of citation analysis. The three claims under study are: (1) economics exhibits strong forms of institutional stratification and, as a byproduct, a rather pronounced internal hierarchy, (2) economists strongly conform to institutional incentives and (3) modern mainstream economics is a largely selfreferential intellectual project mostly inaccessible to disciplinary or paradigmatic outsiders. The valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is essential that last decades has seen an increasing number of documents globally of this field of research, due to authorities and general population have attested to significant worry at this public health problem [ 54 ]. Therefore, researchers prefer publish studies in high impact journals and gain visibility [ 55 ]. For its part, the first two top-10 papers most cited were published in 1995 and 1999, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that last decades has seen an increasing number of documents globally of this field of research, due to authorities and general population have attested to significant worry at this public health problem [ 54 ]. Therefore, researchers prefer publish studies in high impact journals and gain visibility [ 55 ]. For its part, the first two top-10 papers most cited were published in 1995 and 1999, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of one aspect of insularity, Aistleitner et al. (2019) examine citation patterns for the top five journals and compare them with the patterns for the top five journals in other disciplines. The focus is on what the authors call “self‐referentiality,” which is the proportion of references for articles in the top five journals over the period 2009 to 2013 that cite the same group of journals.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While one‐fifth of authors of the articles published in 1995 in a group of top 30 economics journals were from 12 elite U.S. universities, more than half of the authors of articles in these journals received their PhD at these universities (Hodgson & Rothman, 1999). In an update of this study, for 2014 articles in three top journals—the AER , JPE , and QJE —over one‐third (38%) of the authors were affiliated with the 12 elite universities while 55% of the authors had received their PhD from this group of universities (Aistleitner et al., 2019). This suggests that studying micro‐geographic concentration in terms of author‐affiliations will provide a lower bound on the extent of spatial clustering in economics given that the locations where highly ranked economists received their doctoral training may be even more spatially concentrated than are their employing institutions.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, almost 60 per cent of the 1000 most-cited articles are published in 'topfive' journals (see also Laband (2013)). It is also remarkable, thatmeasured in terms of cited referencesthe discourse within the 'top-five' journals is also highly concentrated: On average, one out of four citations made in a 'top-five' journal either stem from the same journal (self-citation) or from its four 'best buddies' (Aistleitner et al 2019).…”
Section: On the Institutional Peculiarities Of Economics: The Power Omentioning
confidence: 99%