2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citation Rate Predictors in the Plastic Surgery Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Level of evidence was not associated with higher citation rates. Although initially counterintuitive, the influence of level of evidence on citation rate has been debated, and this finding is in concordance with that of Lopez et al, 10 who found that higher level of evidence was not associated with higher citation rates. Other studies further suggested that traditional measures of study quality, such as level of evidence, have less of an impact on citation rate than previously thought.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Level of evidence was not associated with higher citation rates. Although initially counterintuitive, the influence of level of evidence on citation rate has been debated, and this finding is in concordance with that of Lopez et al, 10 who found that higher level of evidence was not associated with higher citation rates. Other studies further suggested that traditional measures of study quality, such as level of evidence, have less of an impact on citation rate than previously thought.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A more robust study could have examined a greater number of articles with a longer postpublication citation period; however, we used the 5-year period to reproduce the methods of other studies in the literature that investigated citation rates. 1,5,10,12,21 Furthermore, we believe that this immediate period better represents the impact of a study once published. Second, we did not control for self-citation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Callaham et al and Lopez et al reported significant effect of controlling. 8,14) Conversely, Okike et al could not verify this effect. 9) In any case, the added benefit of a larger sample size should be emphasized to increase both the validity and citation rate of clinical studies in hand surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We followed the methodology of several previous studies to categorize orthopaedic subspecialty field, study groups, and sample size. 8,9,14,15) Sample size was grouped as small (one ≤ n < 25), moderate (25 ≤ n < 100), or large (100 ≤ n). We used this categorical variable analysis instead of continuous variable analysis to diminish the effect of the studies using big data, whose sample size can be an outlier.…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation