2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0539-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citations and science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, impact metrics have often underrated the scientific contribution of papers in the clinical and social pharmacy practice areas [ 58 ]. They provide low coverage of many journals in the databases used to extract citations and often lack any semblance of a pharmacy practice subject category [ 9 , 10 ], often including pharmacy practice journals under Pharmacology and Pharmacy [ 59 ], thus placing papers from our discipline into a category with high-consensus bench, or biological sciences where higher citations are the norm.…”
Section: Using the Metrics Wiselymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, impact metrics have often underrated the scientific contribution of papers in the clinical and social pharmacy practice areas [ 58 ]. They provide low coverage of many journals in the databases used to extract citations and often lack any semblance of a pharmacy practice subject category [ 9 , 10 ], often including pharmacy practice journals under Pharmacology and Pharmacy [ 59 ], thus placing papers from our discipline into a category with high-consensus bench, or biological sciences where higher citations are the norm.…”
Section: Using the Metrics Wiselymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 Notably, impact metrics have often underrated the scientific contribution of papers in the clinical and social pharmacy practice areas. 59 They provide low coverage of many journals in the databases used to extract citations and often lack any semblance of a pharmacy practice subject category, 9 10 often including pharmacy practice journals under Pharmacology and Pharmacy, 60 thus placing papers from our discipline into a category with high-consensus bench or biological sciences where higher citations are the norm.…”
Section: Using the Metrics Wiselymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, impact metrics have often underrated the scientific contribution of papers in the clinical and social pharmacy practice areas. 59 They provide low coverage of many journals in the databases used to extract citations and often lack any semblance of a pharmacy practice subject category 910 , often including pharmacy practice journals under Pharmacology and Pharmacy, 60 thus placing papers from our discipline into a category with high-consensus bench, or biological sciences where higher citations are the norm.…”
Section: Using the Metrics Wiselymentioning
confidence: 99%