Citizen-Scholars: Social Media and the Changing Nature of Scholarship

Abstract

Research is rarely created for private use; researchers publish their work so that others can read and use it, to advance the collective understanding of a field and impact people’s lives. Yet traditional approaches to scholarship, which emphasize publication in subscription-based rather than open access journals, inhibit not only the dissemination of research but also its usefulness, particularly outside of academia. Across all fields, scholars, educators, and members of the public benefit from scholarship which is easily accessible. Open science and public, social scholarship can break down these barriers to accessibility and utility. In this age which calls for a more informed citizenry, the use of social media to share and promote discussion of research could change not only the nature of scholarly communication but also the nature of scholarship and scholars’ roles. In this conceptual article, we argue that practicing public, social scholarship and increasing the use of social media to promote scholarship are the civic responsibility of citizen-scholars, so that research becomes more widely accessible, shareable, and usable in the public sphere.

Teaching with social media: evidence-based strategies for making remote higher education less remote

“…fanfiction) (Lammers and Marsh, 2015;Padgett and Curwood, 2016). Integrating social media into coursework can be an opportunity to grant students creative freedom and inspire them to find new ways to collaborate and engage a broader audience in their work (Chapman and Greenhow, 2019). For example, students may be asked to work together to create and/or run a blog, website, video, video channel or other account hosted through a social media platform (e.g.…”

A Systematic Review of Higher Education Academics’ Use of Microblogging for Professional Development: Case of Twitter

“…Trust, Carpenter and Krutka (2017) highlighted that their persistent availability and expansiveness fostered new learning experiences. Others have argued that PLNs have the potential to bridge the boundaries between formal and informal learning (Greenhow & Lewin, 2016), change the nature of scholarly practice (Chapman & Greenhow, 2019;Greenhow, Gleason & Staudt Willet, 2019) and scholarly communication (Sugimoto, Work, Larivière & Haustein, 2017) facilitate communication with others and to allow the finding and sharing of information (Mansour, 2015;Manca & Ranieri, 2016).…”

“…As a backchannel Twitter provides a space for academics to engage in various scholarly and academic-related activities. The Twitter backchannel has demonstrated the potential to impact scholarly practice of academics (Chapman & Greenhow, 2019;Greenhow, Gleason & Staudt Willet, 2019) by extending the scholarly communication channel (Sugimoto, Work, Larivière & Haustein, 2017) to a more diverse group of academics. However, Twitter as a conference backchannel is not without issues though open to everyone because in some instances small numbers of users may contribute proportionally more than others .…”

Toward a conceptual framework for scholarly information seeking

“…In today's information environment, passive attention to scholarship can take place on social media sites. Scholars can follow one another's updates or follow a particular topic on sites like Twitter, Facebook, Academia.edu, Research Gate, or through RSS feeds (Chapman & Greenhow, 2019). Wilson's model also includes the ideas of risk and reward (searching decreases when the gains from more searching decrease).…”