Citizens and the legitimacy outcomes of collaborative governance An administrative burden perspective

Dupuy, Claire; Defacqz, Samuel

doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.2000254

Cited by 25 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The new arrangement is deemed important not only for technical purposes but also for more fundamental goals that deal with the principles of democracy. Collaboration, at the very least, increases policy, government, and state legitimacy [37]. CCM is then a mix of collaborative public management and crisis management [38].…”

Section: Toward Collaborative Crisis Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting Crisis Governance: Toward Collaborative Crisis Management

Lele¹

2023

Crisis Management - Principles, Roles and Application

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter attends to three main modes of crisis governance: centralization, decentralization, and collaborative crisis management (CCM). While the first two modes focus almost exclusively on government actors, CCM goes beyond them by involving private sectors and civil society. CCM is a more robust form of crisis governance since it combines knowledge and resources from multiple actors, which is a key to managing the more complex nature of modern crises. This chapter uses the case of Indonesia in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic to show the dynamics of crisis governance. Indonesia moved from a centralized mode of crisis governance toward a more decentralized one. Simultaneously, there were several collaborative initiatives involving multiple stakeholders to deal with the crisis, such as in the case of SONJO. The case illustrates that while CCM provides a more effective response, it has some limitations as it has a smaller scale, may create internal conflict, lacks sustainability, and has a nonbinding character. The experience of Indonesia lends the lesson that for CCM to be robust crisis governance, and there needs to be a clear arrangement to boost its scale, manage internal conflict, improve sustainability, and induce a more permanent and binding framework.

show abstract

Section: Toward Collaborative Crisis Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting Crisis Governance: Toward Collaborative Crisis Management

Lele¹

2023

Crisis Management - Principles, Roles and Application

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most recent research sources relate collaborative governance to concepts and issues such as accountability (Lee & Ospina, 2022;, governance networks, (Wang & Ran, 2021), meta-governance (Sørensen & Torfing, 2017), leadership (Imperial et al, 2016;Sørensen & Torfing, 2018), sustainability and SDGs (Florini & Pauli, 2018;Hofstad & Torfing, 2015), innovation (Crosby et al, 2017), legitimacy (Dupuy & Defacqz, 2022), and trust (Ran & Qi, 2019). There are certainly many concepts and aspects that come into play when looking at collaborative governance.…”

Section: Etorkizuna Eraikiz Within the Literature Review Of Collabora...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Building Collaborative Governance in Times of Uncertainty

Bouckaert¹

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Democratic societies are being challenged to look for new ways of doing politics that involve different stakeholders, particularly citizens. This book looks at public authorities' attempts to put society at the core of public policies in the form of collaborative governance. It provides a full account of a major case from the provincial council of Gipuzkoa (Basque Country, Spain): 150 projects, more than 900 organisations, and 50.000 participants and beneficiaries. ‘Pracademic’ lessons learned derive from the interaction among 50 practitioners engaged in the day-to-day practice of the case and scholars from different countries. Topics included relate to major challenges that collaborative governance reforms are facing across the world: structures, institutionalisation, relationships, leadership, accountability, innovation, experimentation, communication, intangible resources, trust, and assessment of outcomes (particularly in terms of Sustainable Development Goals or SDGs. Ultimately, issues of democracy arise from a case covering a comprehensive list of policies: health, employment, elderly care, energy, cybersecurity, electromobility, artificial intelligence, immigration, education, social equity, and culture. This book is intended for students, professionals and scholars interested in fostering the study and practice of democracy.

show abstract

“…It is shifting from the state-centered social steering, managerial and adversarial models of public management to collaborative decision-making, bringing stakeholders (multiple actors, organizations, and governments) together (Ansell & Gash, 2008;McGuire, 2000). The weaknesses of this theory have only been recently addressed by exposing its difficulties with accountability and legitimacy (Dupuy & Defacqz, 2022).Collaborative governance, collaborative network structures (Booher, 2004), participatory management, interactive policymaking, stakeholder governance, and collaborative public management still constitute a significant stream (Ansell & Gash, 2008;Rapp, 2020). The idea is linked with an understanding of collaboration as a form of democracy, with the focus on solving public issues (Kemmis & McKinney, 2011) while also enlightening and engaging citizens in a process of self-governance.…”

Section: The Evolution Of the Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical Perspectives on Bureaucrats: A Quest for Democratic Agents

Železnik

Fink‐Hafner

2023

Administration & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the relationship between bureaucracy and democracy has gained attention in historical cycles, the literature on the roles of bureaucrats in relation to democracy has become increasingly fragmented. Drawing on comparisons among public administration theory, as well as participatory, deliberative, and collaborative democracy, this article provides typologies that reflect the historical multiplication of the theoretically determined roles and characteristics of bureaucracy that contribute to democracy. This comparative analysis has demonstrated a common democratic trend among the four schools in adding stresses on bureaucrats’ autonomy, morality, publicity, and direct connection to citizens, with a constant coexistence of rational and managerial elements.

show abstract

Citizens and the legitimacy outcomes of collaborative governance An administrative burden perspective

Cited by 25 publications

References 66 publications

Revisiting Crisis Governance: Toward Collaborative Crisis Management

Revisiting Crisis Governance: Toward Collaborative Crisis Management

Building Collaborative Governance in Times of Uncertainty

Theoretical Perspectives on Bureaucrats: A Quest for Democratic Agents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About